Trial reportJournal of health, population, and nutrition2025
Women-led sustainable irrigation improved indicators of nutritional status in children from Northern Benin.
Trial report in Journal of health, population, and nutrition, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundClimate change threatens food security and child nutrition in Africa. This study assessed the impact of community-based, solar-powered drip irrigation gardens (SMGs) on the nutritional status of children in households reliant on local food production.
methodsWomen's groups (WGs) from 16 matched villages in Northern Benin were randomly assigned to receive SMGs (WG_SMG) or continue traditional irrigation (WG_C). Additional households without women's groups (NWG_SMG and NWG_C) were recruited from intervention and comparison villages. Children aged 1-5 years participated in baseline and one-year follow-up surveys. Outcomes included dietary diversity, anthropometry, anemia, and micronutrient status. Dietary diversity was assessed using the WHO minimum dietary diversity indicator, based on consumption from at least five of eight food groups in the previous 24 h. Anemia was defined as hemoglobin < 10.5 g/dL or < 11 g/dL, age dependent. Difference-in-differences analysis estimated treatment effects (TEs).
resultsWG_SMG participation increased the percentage of children meeting minimum dietary diversity compared with all groups (TE: 0.64; p < 0.001). Hemoglobin concentrations increased in WG_SMG children versus all groups (TE: 0.53; p < 0.05), with reductions in anemia compared with WG_C (TE: - 0.15; p < 0.05). WG_SMG membership also improved weight-for-age z-scores (TE: 0.35; p < 0.05) and reduced wasting (TE: - 0.04; p < 0.01). Effects remained statistically significant when clustering at child or village levels.
conclusionsChildren from women-owned SMGs had improved dietary diversity, hemoglobin status, and growth outcomes while reducing anemia and wasting compared to controls. Expanding this technology may enhance food security and child nutrition in climate-vulnerable regions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.