ArticleBMC zoology2025
Sexual size dimorphism and morphological sex determination in the Yellow-browed Bunting (Emberiza chrysophrys).
Article in BMC zoology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundSex-differential migration patterns may coevolve with sexual size dimorphism, and reliable field sexing is necessary to understand this relationship. At stopover sites near the wintering grounds, Yellow-browed Buntings (Emberiza chrysophrys) exhibit relatively low levels of protandry and sexual size dimorphism among bunting species. Plumage-based criteria for this species are further complicated at autumn stopovers, where molt progression varies, and the difficulty of sexing and ageing can vary across sites and seasons. Although sexual size dimorphism (SSD) in this species has been reported, morphological sexing has not been validated with molecular methods, and large-scale ringing programs are unable to feasibly genotype all individuals. We therefore aimed to quantify SSD and develop practical morphometric discriminant functions using molecularly validated sex determinations, thereby enabling a better assessment of sex differential migration patterns and their relationship with morphology in this species.
resultsWe measured 50 migratory first-year Yellow-browed Buntings captured during autumn stopover on Daecheong Island, South Korea, and confirmed sex through molecular assays. Among the 50 first-year birds (24 males, 26 females), sexual size dimorphism was strongest in wing length (Cohen’s d = 3.00) and tail length (d = 2.11). For discriminant function analysis, a simplified wing-only model (D0) achieved 92.0% leave-one-out cross-validation accuracy, as did the wing-and-tail model (D2) and the stepwise-selected model (D3, wing-only). All models relied principally on wing length as the primary discriminator.
conclusionsThese morphometric discriminant functions enable accurate, rapid sexing of Yellow-browed Buntings in the field without genetic testing. They facilitate demographic monitoring and sex-specific ecological studies at stopover sites and can be applied to individuals with ambiguous field identification characteristics, thereby improving our understanding of sex differential migration patterns and their coevolutionary relationship with morphology in Yellow-browed Buntings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.