Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41361479›Full record

Trial reportJournal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation2025

The Berlin bimanual test for stroke survivors (BeBiT-S): evaluating exoskeleton-assisted bimanual motor function after stroke.

Mareike Vermehren, Annalisa Colucci, Cornelius Angerhöfer, Niels Peekhaus, Won-Seok Kim, Won Kee Chang, Hyunji Kim, Volker Hömberg, Nam-Jong Paik, Surjo R Soekadar

Registry-linked trialAbstract readClinical TrialMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04440709 (Restoration of Bimanual Activities of Daily Living Using a Brain/Neural Hand Exoskeleton), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04440709 naunknown statusnot on this map

Restoration of Bimanual Activities of Daily Living Using a Brain/Neural Hand Exoskeleton (B/NHE) in Hand Paralysis

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity Hospital TuebingenRan2020 to 2020Enrolled10ConditionsSpinal Cord Injury, StrokeArmsBrain/neural hand exoskeleton (B/NHE)
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Mareike VermehrenClinical Neurotechnology Laboratory, Dept. of Psychiatry and Neurosciences, Charité Campus Mitte (CCM), Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Charitéplatz 1, 10117, Berlin, Germany.
Annalisa ColucciClinical Neurotechnology Laboratory, Dept. of Psychiatry and Neurosciences, Charité Campus Mitte (CCM), Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Charitéplatz 1, 10117, Berlin, Germany.
Cornelius AngerhöferClinical Neurotechnology Laboratory, Dept. of Psychiatry and Neurosciences, Charité Campus Mitte (CCM), Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Charitéplatz 1, 10117, Berlin, Germany.
Niels PeekhausClinical Neurotechnology Laboratory, Dept. of Psychiatry and Neurosciences, Charité Campus Mitte (CCM), Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Charitéplatz 1, 10117, Berlin, Germany.
Won-Seok KimDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, 82, Gumi-Ro 173 Beon-Gil, Bundang-Gu, Seongnam-Si, Gyeonggi-Do, 13620, Republic of Korea.
Won Kee ChangDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, 82, Gumi-Ro 173 Beon-Gil, Bundang-Gu, Seongnam-Si, Gyeonggi-Do, 13620, Republic of Korea.
Hyunji KimDepartment of Health Science and Technology, Graduate School of Convergence Science and Technology, Seoul National University KR, Seoul, South Korea.
Volker HömbergSRH Gesundheitszentrum Bad Wimpfen GmbH, Bad Wimpfen, Germany.
Nam-Jong PaikDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, 82, Gumi-Ro 173 Beon-Gil, Bundang-Gu, Seongnam-Si, Gyeonggi-Do, 13620, Republic of Korea.
Surjo R SoekadarClinical Neurotechnology Laboratory, Dept. of Psychiatry and Neurosciences, Charité Campus Mitte (CCM), Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Charitéplatz 1, 10117, Berlin, Germany. surjo.soekadar@charite.de.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundBrain/neural hand exoskeletons (B/NHEs) can restore motor function after severe stroke, enabling bimanual tasks critical for various activities of daily living. Yet, reliable clinical tests for assessing bimanual function compatible with B/NHEs are lacking. Here, we introduce the Berlin Bimanual Test for Stroke (BeBiT-S), a 10-task assessment focused on everyday bimanual activities, and evaluate its psychometric properties as well as compatibility with assistive technologies such as B/NHEs.

methodsBeBiT-S tasks were selected based on their relevance to daily activities, representation of various grasp types, and compatibility with current (neuro-)prosthetic devices. A scoring system was developed to assess key aspects of bimanual function-including reaching, grasping, stabilizing, manipulating, and lifting-based on video recordings of task performance. The BeBiT-S was administered without support of assistive technology (unassisted condition) to 24 stroke survivors (mean age = 56.5 years; 9 female) with upper-limb hemiparesis. We evaluated interrater reliability through the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and construct validity through correlations with the Chedoke Arm and Hand Activity Inventory (CAHAI), and Stroke Impact Scale (SIS). A subgroup of 15 stroke survivors (mean age 50.3 years, 5 female) completed a second session supported by a B/NHE (B/NHE-assisted condition) to assess the BeBiT-S' sensitivity to change related to B/NHE-application.

resultsThe BeBiT-S demonstrated high interrater reliability in both the unassisted (ICC = 0.985, P < .001) and B/NHE-assisted (ICC = 0.862, P < .001) conditions. Unassisted BeBiT-S scores correlated with the CAHAI-8 (r(22) = 0.95, P < .001) and the SIS subscales "strength" (r(20) = 0.53, P = .012) and "hand function" (r(20) = 0.50, P = .018), indicating construct validity. BeBiT-S scores improved significantly with B/NHE assistance (Mdn = 60, P < .05), compared to when no assistance was provided (Mdn = 38, P < .05), demonstrating the test's sensitivity to change following the application of a B/NHE.

conclusionsThe findings support that the BeBiT-S is a reliable and valid tool for evaluating bimanual task performance in stroke survivors and is compatible with the use of assistive technology such as B/NHEs. Trial registration NCT04440709, submitted June 18th, 2020.

Indexed as

Exoskeleton DeviceHandStrokeStroke RehabilitationActivities of Daily LivingAdultAgedFemaleHand StrengthHumansMaleMiddle AgedPsychometricsPsychomotor PerformanceReproducibility of ResultsSurvivorsAssistive roboticsBimanual task performanceBrain-computer interface (BCI)Clinical assessmentExoskeletonStroke

Identifiers

PMID41361479
PMCPMC12699850

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.