ArticleRetrovirology2025
Intra-pol proviral open region of HTLV-1 controls the transcription from both long terminal repeats.
Article in Retrovirology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Viral-driven oncogenesis in T/NK-cell lymphomas: parallels and divergences between HTLV-1 and EBV.International journal of hematology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundHuman T-cell leukemia virus type 1 (HTLV-1) infects mainly CD4
resultsATAC-seq analysis identified an open chromatin region in the pol gene of proviral DNA, which we name IPOR, in many ATL cases. Using reporter assays, it was found that the sequence of IPOR suppresses the transcription of the plus strand and activates that of the minus strand. Binding motifs of Eomes and TEAD proteins were predicted in this region, and we confirmed recruitment of the transcription factors to their respective motifs by ChIP-qPCR. A mutant of IPOR which cannot bind the transcription factors weakened the transcriptional activating effects compared with the wild type, suggesting that the IPOR and those transcription factors suppress the 5' long terminal repeat (LTR) but activate the 3'LTR. In addition, a mutant HTLV-1 molecular clone, which possesses the IPOR mutant, produced a higher titer of virus than the wild type. RNA-seq analysis of HTLV-1-infected cell lines, in which Tax expression can be traced after induction, revealed that EOMES expression decreases during the tax transcriptional burst and resumes following termination of the burst. These findings suggested that the expression dynamics of Eomes affect the transient expression of Tax.
conclusionsThe IPOR sequence appears to regulate the transcription from both LTRs, suppressing the 5'LTR but activating the 3'LTR. Recruitment of Eomes to the IPOR is likely to influence the expression of Tax and HBZ. Since both viral genes are involved in diverse mechanisms for viral replication, cellular proliferation, and immune regulation, the IPOR may play a role in fine-tuning the modes of viral persistence in vivo.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.