ArticleScientific reports2025
Metabolic factors are associated with a higher risk of conventional adenoma in males during surveillance colonoscopy: findings from a South Australian cohort.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Metabolic factors are associated with an increased risk of colorectal neoplasia, but whether metabolic factors impact individuals already considered at elevated risk of CRC due to a family or personal history of neoplasia is unknown. This study aimed to determine whether metabolic factors are associated with an increased risk of colorectal neoplasia in individuals undergoing surveillance colonoscopy in an Australian cohort. A retrospective cohort study design with a sample size of 2806 was implemented using colonoscopy and metabolic data from a hospital surveillance program. The association between self-reported metabolic factors (obesity, hypertension, type two diabetes (T2DM), dyslipidemia, and a cluster of these factors called metabolic syndrome (MetS)) and diagnosis of colorectal neoplasia, its advanced form, or histopathological subtypes at surveillance colonoscopy was analysed using logistic regression models. Metabolic factors that increased the odds of colorectal neoplasia diagnosis included obesity (adjusted odds ratio (AOR) = 1.61; 95% CI 1.06-2.44), T2DM (AOR = 1.40; 95% CI 1.09-1.80), and MetS (AOR = 1.47; 95%CI 1.10-1.99), with similar findings observed for the association with advanced colorectal neoplasia (obesity: AOR = 1.24; 95% CI 1.01-1.51; T2DM: AOR = 1.29; 95%CI 1.06-1.56; MetS: AOR = 1.45; 95% CI 1.18-1.80). These associations were driven by conventional adenomas (87% of all neoplasia) in males. No associations were observed between metabolic factors and colorectal neoplasia in females, nor for the odds of serrated polyps (p > 0.05). Obesity, T2DM and MetS were significant risk factors for the risk of conventional adenoma in a surveillance population, specifically in males. These metabolic disorders should be considered when determining the frequency of colonoscopy surveillance for males.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.