ArticleBMC medical imaging2025
Differentiating the differentiation degree of gastric cancer based on MRI radiomics.
Article in BMC medical imaging, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPreoperative differentiation between poorly and highly differentiated gastric cancers is important for treatment decisions. PURPOSE: To investigate a radiomics model for preoperative differentiation between poorly and highly differentiated gastric cancers. STUDY TYPE: Retrospective. POPULATION: 239 patients with gastric cancer were included in the study. 167 patients were assigned to the training group and 72 patients comprised the testing group. SEQUENCE: T2-weighted (T2WI), T1-weighted (T1WI), diffusion-weighted imaging(DWI)on a 3·0T MR scanner. ASSESSMENT: A total of 2632 radiomics features were extracted from DWI and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) maps. Radiomics based on above features were built using four feature selection methods and three classifiers. All models were used to differentiate poorly and highly differentiated gastric cancers. STATISTICAL TESTS: 1) An analysis of independent t test was performed for clinicopathological information. 2) Four feature selection methods (Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator [LASSO], Analysis Of Variance [ANOVA], Recursive Feature Elimination [RFE] and Kruskal Wallis[KW]) and three classifiers (Support Vector Machine [SVM], Linear Discriminant Analysis [LDA] and Logistic Regression [LR]) were used to construct twelve radiomics. 3) The performance of different radiomics model was assessed using area under the receiver-operating characteristic curve (AUC) and accuracy (Acc) values.
resultsThe model LASSO + SVM achieved the highest AUC of 0.854 with Acc of 0.793 in all radiomics model. The combination of ADCmin and radiomics achieved the highest diagnostic efficiency with AUC of 0.919 and Acc of 0.823. DATA
conclusionThe combined model of radiomics and ADCmin was accurate for distinguishing poorly and highly differentiated gastric cancers. STUDY TYPE: Retrospective.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.