ArticleBMC geriatrics2025
Assessing physical therapists' knowledge in fall prevention among older adults in Saudi arabia: a cross-sectional study.
Article in BMC geriatrics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundFalls among older adults remain a major global health concern, often leading to injury, disability, and loss of independence. Physical therapists are key stakeholders in fall prevention, yet their knowledge, attitudes, and practices remain underexplored in Saudi Arabia.
objectivesThis study aimed to assess physical therapists' knowledge, attitudes, and confidence regarding fall prevention strategies for adults aged 65 and above and to identify factors influencing the implementation of these strategies in clinical settings.
methodsA descriptive cross-sectional study was conducted using a validated online questionnaire distributed to licensed physical therapists across Saudi Arabia. Convenience and purposive sampling were employed to ensure diverse representation across regions and facility types. Data was analyzed using SPSS v28. Descriptive statistics described demographics and knowledge levels. Non-parametric tests (Mann-Whitney U and Kruskal-Wallis) and chi-square tests examined associations between demographic/professional factors and fall prevention practices. Multiple and robust regression models were applied to adjust for potential confounders.
resultsOf 384 respondents, 52.1% exhibited high knowledge of fall prevention strategies. However, only 14.8% consistently used standardized assessment tools. Education level was not significantly associated with knowledge (H = 4.05, p = 0.256); instead, frequent use of standardized tools was strongly linked to higher knowledge scores (H = 52.36, p < 0.001, ε² = 0.128). Therapists with ≥ 11 years of experience demonstrated greater tool utilization (p = 0.043). Familiarity with international guidelines such as the STEADI toolkit remained low (10.2%). Despite positive attitudes toward fall prevention (M = 4.23, SD = 1.00), self-reported confidence in applying these strategies was moderate (M = 3.60, SD = 0.94). Risk factors like urinary incontinence, polypharmacy and sensory deficits were often underrated.
conclusionWhile theoretical knowledge is strong, practical application is inconsistent. Findings highlight the importance of structured professional development, hands-on training in standardized assessment tools, and integration of evidence-based fall-prevention frameworks into routine physiotherapy practice. Enhancing training, promoting evidence-based tools, and reinforcing interdisciplinary collaboration are essential to improving fall prevention practices among Saudi physical therapists.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.