Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41361363›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Assessment of a VoIP steganalysis method based on statistical analysis and deep neural network.

Hojat Allah Moghadasi, Hamid Dehghani

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Hojat Allah MoghadasiFaculty of Electrical & Computer Engineering, Malek Ashtar University of Technology, Tehran, Iran.
Hamid DehghaniFaculty of Electrical & Computer Engineering, Malek Ashtar University of Technology, Tehran, Iran. hmtbtss2015@gmail.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recent widespread utilization of Voice over Internet Protocol (VoIP) has made it a common medium for covert communication via steganography. In order to counter these security threats, several steganalysis approaches have been developed, among which the integration of signal processing and machine learning techniques has enabled the creation of highly accurate steganalyzers. This research study proposes a hybrid method that combines speech signal processing techniques with Artificial Intelligence (AI). Data preprocessing is first applied to audio signals compressed in G.729 codec, which effectively extracts intra-frame features and inter-frame correlations. The resulting data are fed into a deep learning network for the training model to distinguish between cover data and stego data. The evaluation of the implementation findings demonstrates significant improvements in both detection accuracy and computational efficiency. The present technique is assessed for two steganography families, namely Quantization Index Modulation (QIM) and Pitch Modulation Steganography (PMS), as well as their combined application, Heterogeneous Parallel Steganography (HPS). Furthermore, all three techniques: QIM, PMS, and HPS show a superiority in accuracy when compared to conventional methods. Furthermore, during the steganalysis testing phase for 1000 ms audio files, the response test time was less than 5ms with 98.85%, 96.94% and 91.90% accuracy for QIM. PMS and HPS methods respectively. It highlights the high speed of the suggested model in the testing step which is utilized for real-time steganalysis applications.

Indexed as

Deep learning-based steganalysisG.729 codecHPSPMSQIMReal-time detection

Identifiers

PMID41361363
PMCPMC12795825

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.