ArticleScientific reports2025
Assessment of a VoIP steganalysis method based on statistical analysis and deep neural network.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Recent widespread utilization of Voice over Internet Protocol (VoIP) has made it a common medium for covert communication via steganography. In order to counter these security threats, several steganalysis approaches have been developed, among which the integration of signal processing and machine learning techniques has enabled the creation of highly accurate steganalyzers. This research study proposes a hybrid method that combines speech signal processing techniques with Artificial Intelligence (AI). Data preprocessing is first applied to audio signals compressed in G.729 codec, which effectively extracts intra-frame features and inter-frame correlations. The resulting data are fed into a deep learning network for the training model to distinguish between cover data and stego data. The evaluation of the implementation findings demonstrates significant improvements in both detection accuracy and computational efficiency. The present technique is assessed for two steganography families, namely Quantization Index Modulation (QIM) and Pitch Modulation Steganography (PMS), as well as their combined application, Heterogeneous Parallel Steganography (HPS). Furthermore, all three techniques: QIM, PMS, and HPS show a superiority in accuracy when compared to conventional methods. Furthermore, during the steganalysis testing phase for 1000 ms audio files, the response test time was less than 5ms with 98.85%, 96.94% and 91.90% accuracy for QIM. PMS and HPS methods respectively. It highlights the high speed of the suggested model in the testing step which is utilized for real-time steganalysis applications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.