ArticleScientific reports2025
Management status of patients with chronic kidney disease across medical specialties in Japan: a real-world data analysis.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Chronic kidney disease (CKD) contributes to poor renal and cardiovascular outcomes, necessitating early detection and intervention. The current study investigated the variability in CKD management practices across clinical specialties in Japan. Real-world electronic health records of 788,059 patients with suspected CKD between January 2004 and September 2021 were analyzed. Only 1.2% of patients received care in a nephrology department. However, nephrology involvement significantly increased the proportion of patients undergoing quantitative urine protein assessments and receiving a CKD diagnosis. This trend was evident in cardiology, urology, rheumatology, and endocrinology/metabolism departments, where nephrology involvement resulted in more frequent testing and earlier CKD diagnosis. Despite these benefits, the overall proportion of patients with nephrology involvement remains low, especially in the early stages of CKD. These findings highlight the considerable variability in CKD diagnosis and management approaches across clinical departments. Because quantitative urine protein assessment is critical for precise CKD diagnosis and patient care, strategies such as promoting interdepartmental collaboration with nephrology departments and establishing standardized diagnostic protocols tailored to individual specialties and facilities should be prioritized. Implementing such facility- and specialty-specific measures is crucial for enhancing early CKD detection and intervention, ultimately improving clinical outcomes in patients at risk of CKD progression.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.