ArticleScientific reports2025
Diagnostic value, sensitivity and specificity of CT, MRI, and PET in evaluation of cartilage invasion in laryngeal and hypopharyngeal cancer.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In advanced laryngeal (LSCC) and hypopharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (HPSCC), concurrent chemoradiation is the standard approach for organ preservation. However, in T4a disease, upfront surgery followed by adjuvant radio(chemo)therapy is recommended due to suboptimal outcomes with non-surgical treatment. Since cartilage invasion is the principal determinant of T4 staging, its accurate detection is essential for optimal treatment selection. The comparative diagnostic performance of CT, MRI, and FDG-PET in this setting remains uncertain. This retrospective study included 204 patients with LSCC or HPSCC treated between 2010 and 2019 at a tertiary cancer center. All patients underwent pre-therapeutic hybrid FDG-PET combined with CT and/or MRI. Demographic, clinical, and imaging data were collected. Diagnostic accuracy for cartilage invasion was assessed against histopathological findings, and the prevalence of imaging artifacts was analyzed. The study included 204 patients. CT demonstrated higher specificity than MRI for detecting cartilage invasion (86.7% vs. 70.0%), whereas MRI showed greater sensitivity than CT (80.0% vs. 77.1%) but was limited by motion artifacts in 20% of cases. FDG-PET-based metabolic assessment revealed that elevated tumoral SUVmax correlated with cartilage invasion in upfront surgery cases (p = 0.043) but not in salvage surgery cases (p = 0.90). CT is more reliable than MRI for detecting cartilage invasion in LSCC and HPSCC, particularly in patients prone to motion artifacts. FDG-PET adds diagnostic value in upfront surgery candidates, supporting the combined use of CT and PET as the preferred preoperative imaging strategy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.