Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41361325›Full record

ArticleSystematic reviews2025

The role of probiotics and probiotic fortified products supplementation in improving nutritional outcomes in children under 5 with acute malnutrition: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized, controlled trials protocol.

Abiy Hailu Tikuneh, Eyob Ketema Bogale, Getalem Ayechew Beyene, Amare Deribew

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Systematic reviews, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Abiy Hailu TikunehDepartment of Nutrition and Dietetics, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, Bahir Dar University, Po. Box 79, Bahir Dar, Ethiopia. hailuabiy1@gmail.com.ORCID 0009-0008-4981-8520
Eyob Ketema BogaleHealth Promotion and Behavioral Sciences Department, School of Public Health, College of Medicine and Health Science, Bahir Dar University, Po. Box 79, Bahir Dar, Ethiopia.ORCID 0000-0002-0010-3750
Getalem Ayechew BeyeneDepartment of Public Health, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Gondar, Gondar, Ethiopia.ORCID 0000-0003-2810-4517
Amare DeribewDepartment of Epidemiology, Faculty of Public Health, Jimma University, Jimma, Ethiopia.ORCID 0000-0003-2031-6080

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAcute malnutrition, including severe acute malnutrition (SAM) and moderate acute malnutrition (MAM), affects over 45 million children under five globally and remains a leading cause of childhood morbidity and mortality. Despite therapeutic feeding programs using ready-to-use therapeutic foods (RUTFs) and fortified blended foods (FBFs), relapse and suboptimal treatment outcomes persist. Emerging evidence links gut microbiota dysbiosis to impaired nutrient absorption and immune function in malnourished children. Probiotic supplementation has been proposed as a strategy to restore microbial balance, enhance intestinal health, and improve nutritional recovery. However, clinical trial evidence remains inconsistent, particularly for children with MAM.

methodsThis protocol outlines a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating the effects of probiotic or probiotic-fortified product supplementation in children under five diagnosed with SAM or MAM. Databases to be searched include PubMed, Embase, CENTRAL, CINAHL, Web of Science, and Scopus, along with clinical trial registries. Eligible studies will compare probiotic interventions with placebo, standard care, or no treatment. Primary outcomes include weight gain, weight-for-height z-scores (WHZ), mid-upper arm circumference (MUAC), recovery rate, and time to nutritional recovery. Two reviewers will independently conduct study selection, data extraction, and risk of bias assessment using the Cochrane Risk of Bias 2.0 tool. Random-effects meta-analyses will be performed where appropriate. To explore potential sources of heterogeneity, we will perform subgroup analyses based on factors such as strain, dosage, and duration. Furthermore, sensitivity analyses will be used to test the robustness of the findings against various methodological assumptions and decisions. The overall certainty of the evidence for each outcome will be assessed using the GRADE approach. DISCUSSION: This will be the first systematic review to rigorously evaluate probiotic supplementation for both SAM and MAM populations using PRISMA 2020 guidelines and GRADE methodology. Strengths include a focus on high-quality RCTs, comprehensive search strategies, and transparent bias and evidence quality assessments. Limitations may include variability in probiotic strains, formulations, dosages, and outcome measures, as well as limited subgroup data. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: PROSPERO CRD420251091133.

Indexed as

Child Nutrition DisordersDietary SupplementsFood, FortifiedMalnutritionProbioticsSevere Acute MalnutritionChild, PreschoolGastrointestinal MicrobiomeHumansInfantMeta-Analysis as TopicRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicSystematic Reviews as TopicAcute malnutritionMeta-analysisModerate acute malnutritionNutritional recoveryProbioticsSevere acute malnutritionSystematic review

Identifiers

PMID41361325
PMCPMC12797576

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.