Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41361275›Full record

ArticleBMC medical education2025

Residents' perspectives on forensic issues and the impact of postgraduate forensic medicine education on perceived competence and attitudes: a multidisciplinary pre- and post-test study.

Alper Özkök, Seda Saçal, Ümit Şimşek, Cem Terece, Özant Helvacı, Taner Akar, Birol Demirel

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical education, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Alper ÖzkökDepartment of Forensic Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Gazi University, Ankara, 06500, Türkiye. alperozkok@gazi.edu.tr.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0521-5954
Seda SaçalDepartment of Forensic Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Gazi University, Ankara, 06500, Türkiye.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0009-1837-2009
Ümit ŞimşekDepartment of Forensic Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Osmangazi University, Eskişehir, Türkiye.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3544-8871
Cem TereceDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Atatürk City Hospital, Hamidiye School of Medicine, Balıkesir, Türkiye.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5775-5736
Özant HelvacıDepartment of Internal Medicine, Nephrology, Faculty of Medicine, Gazi University, Ankara, Türkiye.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1382-2439
Taner AkarDepartment of Forensic Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Gazi University, Ankara, 06500, Türkiye.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9140-0453
Birol DemirelDepartment of Forensic Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Gazi University, Ankara, 06500, Türkiye.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0717-4818

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPhysicians frequently encounter medicolegal issues, necessitating adequate forensic knowledge to manage these situations effectively. Evaluating residents' views on forensic issues is crucial for assessing forensic medicine education's current status and identifying future specialists' needs.

methods171 residents from five specialties (pediatrics, internal medicine, general surgery, obstetrics and gynecology, emergency medicine) participated in a pre- and post-survey after attending a course covering forensic reports and documentation, physicians' legal responsibilities, and medical malpractice. The study assessed residents' perceived competence, concerns-attitudes, and opinions on these topics and how the training influenced their approaches.

resultsBefore the course, a significant proportion of residents reported feeling incompetent, particularly in their knowledge of forensic report preparation (77.8%), malpractice (78.4%), and physicians' legal responsibilities (88.9%). Many residents felt pressured by the risk of malpractice (66.1%) and were concerned about repercussions from legal authorities due to potential mistakes in reports (58.5%). Reflecting these apprehensions, the vast majority preferred issuing provisional forensic reports (%90.1) rather than final reports. Most residents believed they did not receive sufficient forensic medicine training during medical school and expressed a strong need for further education. Post-training assessments showed significant improvements in residents' perceived competence (p < 0.001) and their preference for preparing final reports (p < 0.001), alongside a significant decrease in concerns about legal authorities (p = 0.032) and malpractice (p = 0.014).

conclusionsResidents' approaches toward medicolegal issues are of great importance as they shape their future practices. Adequate education fosters a proper medicolegal perspective and self-confidence, shielding them from anxiety, defensive practices, malpractice claims, and burnout throughout their careers.

Indexed as

Attitude of Health PersonnelClinical CompetenceEducation, Medical, GraduateForensic MedicineInternship and ResidencyAdultFemaleHumansMaleMalpracticeSurveys and QuestionnairesEducation, medical, graduateForensic medicineInternship and residencyLiability, legalMalpracticeMandatory reporting

Identifiers

PMID41361275
PMCPMC12683801

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.