SynthesisBMC cardiovascular disorders2025
Continuous care on the prognosis of coronary heart disease after PCI: a Meta-analysis and systematic review.
Synthesis in BMC cardiovascular disorders, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- The impact of nursing risk management on quality of life, complications, nursing care satisfaction in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention.Pakistan journal of medical sciences · 2026Article
- Impact of nursing strategy based on the 6S management model on clinical outcomes in patients with acute myocardial infarction after Percutaneous Coronary intervention.Pakistan journal of medical sciences · 2026Article
- Impact of continuous nursing care based on IKAP theory in patients undergoing cardiopulmonary bypass surgery: a cohort study.Journal of cardiothoracic surgery · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundCoronary heart disease (CHD) remains one of the leading causes of morbidity and mortality worldwide. Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is widely used to restore coronary perfusion and improve cardiac outcomes; however, post-procedural management plays a crucial role in ensuring long-term recovery and preventing recurrent cardiovascular events. Continuous nursing, as an extended and structured follow-up model after hospital discharge, may improve patients' quality of life, psychological well-being, and self-management ability. This meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the effect of continuous nursing on the prognosis and overall outcomes of patients with CHD after PCI.
methodsA comprehensive search was conducted through PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, CNKI, Wanfang, CQVIP, and CBM databases up to December 2023. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing continuous nursing with conventional care in CHD patients after PCI were included. Data were analyzed using STATA 15.1 software, and outcomes were summarized as standardized mean difference (SMD) or weighted mean difference (WMD) with 95% confidence intervals (CI).
resultsFourteen RCTs involving 1,463 participants were included. Compared with conventional care, continuous nursing significantly improved quality of life (WMD = 12.34, 95% CI: 8.79-15.88, I
conclusionContinuous care effectively improves quality of life, psychological status, cardiac function, and treatment compliance in patients with CHD following PCI. It also reduces anxiety, depression, and cardiovascular complications, thereby promoting better long-term prognosis. These findings support the clinical implementation of structured continuous nursing programs as a key component of comprehensive CHD management after PCI.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.