ArticleBMC geriatrics2025
Construction and validation of the prediction model for kinesiophobia in older adults with chronic low back pain.
Article in BMC geriatrics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Association Between Body Composition, Muscle-to-Weight Ratio, and Functional Disability in Patients with Chronic Non-Specific Low Back Pain: A Cross-Sectional Study.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2026Observational
- Machine learning in mental health promotion for older adults: a scoping review.BMC geriatrics · 2026Article
- The Relationship Among Pain, Intrinsic Capacity, and Fear of Movement in Patients with Knee Osteoarthritis: A Moderated Network Analysis.Journal of pain research · 2026Article
- Kinesiophobia in stroke patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: a cross-sectional study based on latent profile analysis.Frontiers in neurology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundLow back pain imposes a substantial burden on global healthcare systems. Kinesiophobia is highly prevalent among older adults with chronic low back pain, severely hindering effective intervention and treatment. However, current assessment of kinesiophobia in this population remain inadequate, necessitating further research. This study aimed to develop a predictive model to identify key factors influencing kinesiophobia in older adults with chronic low back pain, thereby assisting clinicians in assessment and interventions.
methodsA cross-sectional study was conducted among 386 older adults with chronic low back pain admitted to the Department of Spinal Surgery and Orthopedic Rehabilitation Center between January 2024 and December 2024. The dataset was randomly split into training (70%) and testing (30%) sets. Six machine learning models, including Logistic Regression(LR), Decision Tree(DT), Random Forest(RF), eXtreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost), Light Gradient Boosting Machine (LightGBM) and Artificial Neural Network(ANN), were developed and evaluated. Model performance was assessed using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC), calibration curves, and other metrics. Clinical utility was examined via decision curve analysis, and predictor significance was interpreted using Shapley additive explanations (SHAP).
resultsThe prevalence of kinesiophobia in the cohort was 65.3%. LightGBM and RF demonstrated robust performance across both training and testing sets. In the testing set, LightGBM achieved superior accuracy, precision, sensitivity, specificity, and F1-score. Key predictors included Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), moderate-to-severe anxiety, pain intensity, moderate-to-severe depression, frailty, smoking, and the history of falls.
conclusionThis study developed a machine learning-based predictive model for assessing kinesiophobia in older adults with chronic low back pain, which providing a reference for kinesiophobia assessment in this patients group and also identifying key intervention priorities for healthcare systems in kinesiophobia management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.