Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41361242›Full record

ArticleScientific data2025

Towards a FAIR metadata framework for drone and uncrewed aerial vehicle data.

Florian J Ellsäßer, Alice Nikuze

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific data, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Florian J EllsäßerFaculty of Geo-Information Science and Earth Observation (ITC), University of Twente, Enschede, Netherlands. f.j.ellsaesser@utwente.nl.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8746-4315
Alice NikuzeFaculty of Geo-Information Science and Earth Observation (ITC), University of Twente, Enschede, Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1849-9968

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Uncrewed Aerial Vehicles (UAVs), or drones, are increasingly used in research areas such as precision agriculture, environmental monitoring, and disaster response. They can carry a wide range of sensors and users produce diverse datasets that include raw imagery, orthomosaics, and spatial models. Sharing these datasets in a Findable, Accessible, Interoperable, and Reusable (FAIR) way requires rich metadata. However, current practices often lack essential details about sensors, processing steps, and licensing, which limits FAIR compliance. We assessed how UAV data is currently published by reviewing metadata from 71 datasets in public repositories. We also evaluated existing metadata frameworks and surveyed over 70 UAV data users and experts to understand their needs and challenges. Based on this analysis, we identify key metadata requirements across the UAV data lifecycle, including information on sensors, spatial and temporal coverage, processing workflows, and provenance. Our goal is to clarify and summarize these needs rather than propose a formal standard. More consistent metadata practices will support the FAIR principles and improve UAV data sharing and reuse in science.

Identifiers

PMID41361242
PMCPMC12816676

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.