ArticleScientific data2025
Towards a FAIR metadata framework for drone and uncrewed aerial vehicle data.
Article in Scientific data, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Uncrewed Aerial Vehicles (UAVs), or drones, are increasingly used in research areas such as precision agriculture, environmental monitoring, and disaster response. They can carry a wide range of sensors and users produce diverse datasets that include raw imagery, orthomosaics, and spatial models. Sharing these datasets in a Findable, Accessible, Interoperable, and Reusable (FAIR) way requires rich metadata. However, current practices often lack essential details about sensors, processing steps, and licensing, which limits FAIR compliance. We assessed how UAV data is currently published by reviewing metadata from 71 datasets in public repositories. We also evaluated existing metadata frameworks and surveyed over 70 UAV data users and experts to understand their needs and challenges. Based on this analysis, we identify key metadata requirements across the UAV data lifecycle, including information on sensors, spatial and temporal coverage, processing workflows, and provenance. Our goal is to clarify and summarize these needs rather than propose a formal standard. More consistent metadata practices will support the FAIR principles and improve UAV data sharing and reuse in science.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.