Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41361233›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Diagnostic performance of real-time artificial intelligence using deep learning analysis of endoscopic ultrasound videos for gallbladder polypoid lesions.

Young Hoon Choi, Jun Young Park, See Young Lee, Jae Hee Cho, Young Jae Kim, Kwang Gi Kim, Sung Ill Jang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Young Hoon Choi *Department of Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Jun Young Park *Department of Translational-Clinical Medicine, Gachon University, Incheon, Republic of Korea.
See Young LeeDepartment of Internal Medicine, Gangnam Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Jae Hee ChoDepartment of Internal Medicine, Gangnam Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Young Jae KimGachon Biomedical & Convergence Institute, Gachon University Gil Medical Center, Incheon, Republic of Korea.
Kwang Gi Kim *Medical Devices R&D Center, Gachon University Gil Medical Center, Incheon, Republic of Korea. kimkg@gachon.ac.kr.
Sung Ill Jang *Department of Internal Medicine, Gangnam Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea. aerojsi@yuhs.ac.

Funding

Korea Medical Device Development Fund 1711196789, RS-2023-00252804Yonsei University College of Medicine Sung Ill Jang, 6-2023-0209
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) is accurate for diagnosing gallbladder (GB) polyps but is limited by subjective interpretation and operator expertise. Although artificial intelligence (AI) has been applied to still EUS images of GB polyps, its application to EUS videos, which provide richer diagnostic data, remains unexplored. This study evaluated the diagnostic performance of AI models in analyzing EUS videos for GB polyp assessment. EUS videos of patients with histologically confirmed GB polyps were divided into training and validation cohorts. Segmentation models (Attention U-Net, Residual U-Net, and deep understanding convolutional kernel [DUCK] net) identified polyp regions, followed by classification into neoplastic and non-neoplastic polyps using classification models (EfficientNet-B2, ResNet101, and vision transformer). The training cohort included 17 (11 patients) and 79 (39 patients) videos with neoplastic and non-neoplastic polyps, respectively, and the validation cohort included 11 (6 patients) and 25 (11 patients) videos, respectively. Attention U-Net (0.998) and DUCK Net (0.995) achieved the highest training cohort segmentation accuracy. EfficientNet-B2 showed the highest classification performance (accuracy 0.957, recall 0.954, F1-score 0.939, AUC 0.991) and maintained strong performance on the validation dataset (accuracy 0.879, recall 0.968, F1-score 0.917, AUC 0.861). AI demonstrated high accuracy in EUS video-based GB polyp analysis, warranting further prospective validation.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceDeep LearningEndosonographyGallbladderGallbladder NeoplasmsPolypsAdultAgedFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedArtificial intelligenceDiagnostic performanceEndoscopic ultrasound videoGallbladder polyp

Identifiers

PMID41361233
PMCPMC12764828

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.