ArticleScientific reports2025
Diagnostic performance of real-time artificial intelligence using deep learning analysis of endoscopic ultrasound videos for gallbladder polypoid lesions.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Review
- Advances in Artificial Intelligence for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy: 2026 Update.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) is accurate for diagnosing gallbladder (GB) polyps but is limited by subjective interpretation and operator expertise. Although artificial intelligence (AI) has been applied to still EUS images of GB polyps, its application to EUS videos, which provide richer diagnostic data, remains unexplored. This study evaluated the diagnostic performance of AI models in analyzing EUS videos for GB polyp assessment. EUS videos of patients with histologically confirmed GB polyps were divided into training and validation cohorts. Segmentation models (Attention U-Net, Residual U-Net, and deep understanding convolutional kernel [DUCK] net) identified polyp regions, followed by classification into neoplastic and non-neoplastic polyps using classification models (EfficientNet-B2, ResNet101, and vision transformer). The training cohort included 17 (11 patients) and 79 (39 patients) videos with neoplastic and non-neoplastic polyps, respectively, and the validation cohort included 11 (6 patients) and 25 (11 patients) videos, respectively. Attention U-Net (0.998) and DUCK Net (0.995) achieved the highest training cohort segmentation accuracy. EfficientNet-B2 showed the highest classification performance (accuracy 0.957, recall 0.954, F1-score 0.939, AUC 0.991) and maintained strong performance on the validation dataset (accuracy 0.879, recall 0.968, F1-score 0.917, AUC 0.861). AI demonstrated high accuracy in EUS video-based GB polyp analysis, warranting further prospective validation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.