ArticleScientific reports2025
Psychometric properties of the revised version of the health and safety executive management standards indicator tool.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Adapting the HSE-MS Indicator Tool for Academia: A Psychometric Evaluation of the Academic Teacher Stress Indicator Tool in Italian.La Medicina del lavoro · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Workplace stress is a significant risk for individuals in high-stress jobs. Identifying valid and reliable tools to measure conditions related to workplace stress is essential for targeted interventions. This study aimed to determine the psychometric properties of the revised and Iranian version of the Health & Safety Executive Management Standards Indicator Tool (MSIT-IR). The item pool was created based on the Health & Safety Executive Management Standards Indicator Tool (HSE-MSIT) and findings from a qualitative study. After face and content validity, the psychometric properties of the Indicator Tool were examined. Cronbach's alpha, McDonald's omega, and the intra-class correlation coefficient were calculated to assess reliability. A total of 220 health care workers from 80 primary health care centers completed the MSIT-IR. In exploratory factor analysis, 35 items were loaded, which indicated a 9-factor solution for the questionnaire: Superior support, Demands, Job control, Social support, Changes, Relationships, and three new factors, including Non-job factors, Cognitive structure, and Individual context. Cronbach's alpha (0.949), MacDonald Omega (from 0.739 to 0.894), and intra-class correlation coefficient (0.92) were acceptable. Overall, the results show that the MSIT-IR is reliable and valid. In other words, MSIT-IR can be useful for identifying organizational, social, and individual factors related to workplace stress and implementing targeted interventions. However, further evaluation of MSIT-IR is recommended.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.