Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41361222›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Scene image memorability is learnable via feedback.

Cambria Revsine, Wilma A Bainbridge

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. ERP effects at encoding: Image memorability or recognition success?Cognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience · 2026
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Cambria RevsineDepartment of Psychology, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA. crevsine@uchicago.edu.
Wilma A BainbridgeDepartment of Psychology, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA.

Funding

National Science Foundation 1746045National Science Foundation 2329776
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Memorability, or the likelihood that an image is later remembered, is an intrinsic stimulus property that is remarkably consistent across viewers. Despite this consistency in what people remember and forget, previous findings suggest there may be a lack of consistency in what individuals subjectively believe to be memorable and forgettable. We aimed to improve participants' ability to judge memorability using a feedback-based training paradigm containing face images (Experiment 1) or scene images (Experiment 2a-b and a no-feedback control condition). Overall, participants were fairly accurate at categorizing the memorability of images in the feedback condition. In response to the training, participants were able to improve their memorability judgments of scenes, but not faces. Those who used certain strategies to perform the task, namely relying on characteristic features of the scenes, showed greater learning. These results suggest that with training, human participants can better their understanding of image memorability, but may be unable to access its full variance.

Indexed as

LearningMemoryAdultFeedbackFemaleHumansMalePhotic StimulationYoung AdultFace perceptionMemorabilityMemoryMetacognitionScene perception

Identifiers

PMID41361222
PMCPMC12739115

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.