ArticleAesthetic plastic surgery2026
Regional Nerve Block Anesthesia in Upper Blepharoplasty.
Article in Aesthetic plastic surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundLocal anesthesia is commonly used in upper blepharoplasty but presents several drawbacks, including swelling and distortion of the upper eyelids. These effects can lead to temporary intra- and postoperative pseudoptosis, complicating intraoperative assessment and revision for surgeons. Additionally, local anesthesia prolongs postoperative recovery time and produces more significant anesthetic injection pain over upper eyelid incision line. However, regional nerve block anesthesia has the potential to avoid these complications occurred because it does not require injection into the upper eyelid incision itself, eliminating the possibility of pseudoptosis and reducing anesthetic injection pain. Combining this approach with a specific designed upper eyelid skin incision technique can help reduce bleeding in the incision area. In this study, we describe in detail our new method for regional nerve block anesthesia in upper blepharoplasty. MATERIALS AND
methodsWe performed a retrospective review of patients who underwent upper blepharoplasty under regional nerve block anesthesia from 2009 to 2024 at the second author's clinic. Patients who underwent for aesthetic reasons or eyelid ptosis were included. Those who had undergone revision blepharoplasty for upper eyelid trauma or prominent scars on the upper eyelid were excluded. This retrospective study was based on data obtained from patients' perioperative photographs and medical records, including injection sites, volume of anesthetic solution used, injection pain response, and the intra- and postoperative effects of regional nerve block anesthesia.
resultsThe study included 6,099 patients, with a mean age of 35. Each upper eyelid received an average injection of only 0.9 ml (range = 0.6-1.2 ml) anesthetic solution. In all patients, the regional nerve block anesthesia was successful during the entire upper blepharoplasty, including that of orbital fat debulking or eyelid ptosis repair. There were no cases of intra- or postoperative pseudoptosis occurred. All patients were satisfied with the results, and recovery time was shorter than traditional local anesthesia. No complications have been noted to date.
conclusionRegional nerve block anesthesia is a more effective alternative to traditional local anesthesia in upper blepharoplasty. It reduces swelling and distortion of the upper eyelids, as well as bleeding from upper eyelid incision line when combined with a specific designed upper eyelid incision technique. It also minimizes the volume and pain of anesthetic injections and shortens postoperative recovery time. Moreover, it prevents the occurrence of intra- and postoperative pseudoptosis, significantly improving the surgeon's ability to accurately assess surgical outcomes both during and immediate after the surgery. The anesthesia is successful, with complete or nearly total 100% effectiveness, and free of complications. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE IV: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .
Indexed as
Identifiers
41361143What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.