ArticleDysphagia2026
Hidden Undernourishment: Sex and Disease Factors Associated with the Underrating of Swallowing Function.
Article in Dysphagia, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Accurate assessment of swallowing function is essential to prevent aspiration pneumonia and nutritional decline. However, in hospitalized patients, discrepancies are often observed between clinical assessments and the actual oral intake. We retrospectively analyzed 5,091 patients who underwent a videofluoroscopic swallowing study or videoendoscopic evaluation of swallowing (VE) at our hospital between 2018 and 2024. The Discrepancy Index (DI), as the difference between the Food Intake LEVEL Scale and Fujishima's swallowing ability grade, was calculated. Patients with DI ≤ - 2 were classified as the "underestimated group". Logistic regression analysis was conducted to identify the associated factors. The underestimated group accounted for 22.5% of the cases. Female sex (OR = 1.45, p < 0.001), VE use (OR = 1.68, p < 0.001), pulmonary disease (OR = 1.63, p = 0.001), and disuse-related physical decline (hereafter referred to as disuse syndrome) (OR = 1.71, p = 0.001) were significantly associated with underestimation. The subgroup analyses revealed that these associations were more prominent in men with pulmonary and disuse-related conditions. Overestimation though rare (< 3%) was clinically important. Over 20% of patients were likely to receive unnecessarily restrictive diets due to underestimation of their swallowing function. Such underestimation may be influenced by inaccurate assessments or clinicians' safety concerns, as reported in previous studies. Although sex showed a statistical effect on the DI, it did not indicate a consistent pattern of under- or over-estimation between sexes. Timely and accurate assessment of swallowing through an interdisciplinary collaboration is essential to avoid unnecessary fasting, prevent nutritional decline, and reduce the risk of developing sarcopenic dysphagia.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41361130What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.