Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41361112›Full record

ArticleArchives of toxicology2026

Predicting xenobiotic metabolism: a computational approach mining LC-MS/MS data with SIRIUS and BioTransformer.

Victoria Pozo Garcia, Mengqiu Zhang, Tuğçe S Çobanoğlu, Kasper Holm, Paul Jennings, David A Poole, Sofia Moco

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Archives of toxicology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Victoria Pozo GarciaDepartment of Chemistry and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Amsterdam Institute of Molecular and Life Sciences (AIMMS), Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0009-0000-4080-3156
Mengqiu ZhangDepartment of Chemistry and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Amsterdam Institute of Molecular and Life Sciences (AIMMS), Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Tuğçe S ÇobanoğluDepartment of Chemistry and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Amsterdam Institute of Molecular and Life Sciences (AIMMS), Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Kasper HolmDepartment of Chemistry and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Amsterdam Institute of Molecular and Life Sciences (AIMMS), Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Paul JenningsDepartment of Chemistry and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Amsterdam Institute of Molecular and Life Sciences (AIMMS), Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
David A PooleDepartment of Chemistry and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Amsterdam Institute of Molecular and Life Sciences (AIMMS), Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Sofia MocoDepartment of Chemistry and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Amsterdam Institute of Molecular and Life Sciences (AIMMS), Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. s.moco@vu.nl.ORCID 0000-0001-8170-8876

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Drug biotransformation and bioactivation play a pivotal role in drug discovery, driving the development of analytical methods to investigate xenobiotic metabolism. However, the identification of drug metabolism products (i.e., drug metabolites) remains challenging. Drug metabolites are difficult to predict, and they are often missed without prior knowledge of the drug's metabolic fate. Untargeted approaches overcome this requirement, but demand strategies for metabolite identification. In this study, we developed a computational workflow, using high resolution LC-MS/MS metabolomics data, integrating BioTransformer and SIRIUS for the prediction and putative identification of drug metabolite structures. We challenged our workflow to the analysis of human metabolites from 6 well-known drugs, administered to primary human hepatocytes and human liver microsomes: amitriptyline (10 µM), carbamazepine (12.5 µM), cyclophosphamide (20 µM), fipronil (20 µM), phenytoin (50 µM), and verapamil (6 µM). Of the drugs' metabolites, 62-100% were found using this computational approach. Furthermore, 4 new metabolite structures (1 amitriptyline metabolite and 3 verapamil metabolites) were proposed using de novo predictions in SIRIUS. This strategy proved efficient in accelerating the study of drug metabolism, potentially avoiding tedious manual metabolite identification. In sum, we demonstrate that this computational workflow holds potential in automating metabolite identification, expanding metabolite coverage, and elucidating metabolites of newly developed drugs.

Indexed as

Data MiningXenobioticsAmitriptylineBiotransformationChromatography, LiquidHepatocytesHumansLiquid Chromatography-Mass SpectrometryMetabolomicsMicrosomes, LiverTandem Mass SpectrometryAmitriptylineXenobioticsBioTransformerDrugLC–MSMetabolomicsSIRIUSXenobiotic metabolism

Identifiers

PMID41361112

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.