ArticleJournal of bone and mineral metabolism2026
Assessing deep learning model performance in osteoporosis screening with lumbar spine radiographs.
Article in Journal of bone and mineral metabolism, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Comparing Deep Learning Models for Identifying Maxillary Transverse Deficiency from Intraoral Photographs.International dental journal · 2026Article
- Application of a YOLOv8-based model on lateral lumbar radiographs for screening of acute and chronic thoracolumbar fractures and osteoporosis.BMC musculoskeletal disorders · 2026Article
- Response to comment on "Assessing deep learning model performance in osteoporosis screening with lumbar spine radiographs".Journal of bone and mineral metabolism · 2026Article
- Comment on "Assessing deep learning model performance in osteoporosis screening with lumbar spine radiographs".Journal of bone and mineral metabolism · 2026Article
- Artificial Intelligence for Osteoporosis Diagnosis, Risk Prediction and Therapy: Current Advances, Clinical Challenges, and Future Perspectives.Clinical interventions in aging · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionTo diagnose osteoporosis, assess the risk of fragility fracture, and determine the necessity for treatment, bone mineral density (BMD) is mostly measured from dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) as a gold standard. Due to the limited resources of DXA, we proposed the deep learning models to screen for osteoporosis and measure its accuracy on osteoporosis detection from lumbar spine radiographs. MATERIALS AND
methodsThe models were developed from the training data set (2244 anteroposterior and 2368 lateral lumbar spine radiographs). We categorized patients into two groups based on DXA BMD T-score: non-osteoporosis (T > - 2.5) and osteoporosis (T ≤ - 2.5). A two-class models were trained to classify non-osteoporosis and osteoporosis. Model performance was tested with the test data set (963 AP and 1018 lateral images) to evaluate the accuracy.
resultsThe results showed that, for AP images, the ResNet-18 model diagnosing osteoporosis achieved an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.79 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.76-0.82) with a concomitant sensitivity of 79.7% (95% CI 74.4-85.0%) and specificity of 66.5% (95% CI 63.1-69.9%). For lateral images, the DarkNet-19 model yielded the highest AUC at 0.82 (95% CI 0.80-0.85) with the highest sensitivity for lateral data set at 87.5% (95% CI 83.1-91.9%) and specificity of 79.4% (95% CI 76.6-82.2%).
conclusionsDeep learning models may have the efficacy to anticipate osteoporosis screening based on lumbar spine radiographs which would be helpful as a readily available tool for assessing the risk and determining treatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41361106What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.