Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41361102›Full record

ArticleBehavior research methods2025

Introducing the kollaR package: A user-friendly open-access solution for eye-tracking analysis and visualization.

Johan Lundin Kleberg, Astrid E Z Hallman, Rebecka Astenvald, Ann Nordgren, Terje Falck-Ytter, Ronald van den Berg

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Behavior research methods, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Johan Lundin KlebergDepartment of Psychology, Stockholm University, Frescativägen 8, 106 91, Stockholm, Sweden. johan.lundin.kleberg@su.se.
Astrid E Z HallmanDepartment of Psychology, Stockholm University, Frescativägen 8, 106 91, Stockholm, Sweden.
Rebecka AstenvaldDepartment of Medical Sciences, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.
Ann NordgrenDepartment of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Terje Falck-YtterDevelopment and Neurodiversity Lab, Department of Psychology, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.
Ronald van den BergDepartment of Psychology, Stockholm University, Frescativägen 8, 106 91, Stockholm, Sweden.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Eye tracking has become an increasingly important tool in cognitive and developmental research, providing insights into processes that are difficult to measure otherwise. The majority of eye-tracking studies rely on accurate identification of fixations and saccades in raw data using event classification algorithms (sometimes called fixation filters). Subsequently, it is common to analyze whether fixations or saccades fall into specific areas of interest (AOI). The choice of algorithms can significantly influence study outcomes, especially in special populations such as young children or individuals with neurodevelopmental conditions, where data quality is often compromised by factors such as signal loss, poor calibration, or movement artifacts. It is therefore crucial to examine how available fixation classification algorithms affect the data set at hand as part of the eye-tracking analysis. Here, we introduce the kollaR package, an open-source R library for performing the main steps of an eye-tracking analysis from event classification to AOI-based analyses and visualizations of individual or group-level data for publications. The kollaR package was specifically designed to facilitate the selection and comparison of different event classification algorithms through visualizations. In a validation analysis, we show that results from fixation classification in kollaR are consistent with those from other software implementations of the same algorithms. We demonstrate the use of kollaR with real data from typically developing individuals and individuals with neurodevelopmental conditions, and illustrate how potential threats to validity can be identified in both high- and low-quality data.

Indexed as

Eye MovementsEye-Tracking TechnologySoftwareAlgorithmsFixation, OcularHumansSaccadesArea of InterestEye trackingFixationsR PackageSaccadesSoftware

Identifiers

PMID41361102
PMCPMC12685970

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.