ArticleBehavior research methods2025
Introducing the kollaR package: A user-friendly open-access solution for eye-tracking analysis and visualization.
Article in Behavior research methods, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Comparing feedback learning and arousal responses in Down, Fragile X, and Williams syndromes.NPJ science of learning · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Eye tracking has become an increasingly important tool in cognitive and developmental research, providing insights into processes that are difficult to measure otherwise. The majority of eye-tracking studies rely on accurate identification of fixations and saccades in raw data using event classification algorithms (sometimes called fixation filters). Subsequently, it is common to analyze whether fixations or saccades fall into specific areas of interest (AOI). The choice of algorithms can significantly influence study outcomes, especially in special populations such as young children or individuals with neurodevelopmental conditions, where data quality is often compromised by factors such as signal loss, poor calibration, or movement artifacts. It is therefore crucial to examine how available fixation classification algorithms affect the data set at hand as part of the eye-tracking analysis. Here, we introduce the kollaR package, an open-source R library for performing the main steps of an eye-tracking analysis from event classification to AOI-based analyses and visualizations of individual or group-level data for publications. The kollaR package was specifically designed to facilitate the selection and comparison of different event classification algorithms through visualizations. In a validation analysis, we show that results from fixation classification in kollaR are consistent with those from other software implementations of the same algorithms. We demonstrate the use of kollaR with real data from typically developing individuals and individuals with neurodevelopmental conditions, and illustrate how potential threats to validity can be identified in both high- and low-quality data.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.