ReviewNPP - digital psychiatry and neuroscience2024
Increasing psychopharmacology clinical trial success rates with digital measures and biomarkers: Future methods.
Review in NPP - digital psychiatry and neuroscience, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Comparative study of ERP habituation to tones and fearful vocalizations in autism spectrum disorders: a translational biomarker for sensory hypersensitivity.Molecular psychiatry · 2026Article
- Toward a hybrid assessment framework for adolescent borderline personality disorder: a mini review of personality functioning, digital biomarkers, and AI-supported assessment.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2026Review
- Task-aligned outcome learning in psychiatry: reducing endpoint dilution.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Psychiatric trials have some of the lowest success rates across therapeutic areas, resulting in decreased investment in psychopharmacological drug development even as the need for more effective treatments grows. Digital measures and digital biomarkers (DBMs) provide one potential avenue for ameliorating three of the largest problems impeding clinical trial success in psychiatry: diagnostic heterogeneity, endpoint subjectivity, and high placebo response rates. First, DBMs may address heterogeneity and comorbidity in psychiatric nosology by identifying predictive DBMs of treatment response via the targeting of drugs to psychiatric subtypes. Second, DBMs can provide objective measures of physiology and behavior that when grounded in meaningful aspects of health (MAH) could support use for regulatory decision-making. By objectively and continuously measuring aspects of a patient's disease that the patient wants to improve or prevent from getting worse, DBMs might provide clinical trial endpoints that are more sensitive to treatment effects as compared to traditional clinician-reported outcomes. Lastly, DBMs could help address challenges surrounding high placebo response rates. Development of predictive DBMs of placebo response may allow for improved enrichment study designs to reduce placebo response. Objective digital measures may also be more robust against the placebo effect and offer an improved study endpoint alternative. Successful deployment of DBMs to address the historical challenges facing psychiatric drug trials will require close collaboration between industry, academic, and regulatory partners.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.