ArticleBritish journal of cancer2026
Survival outcomes of ERBB2-amplified metastatic colorectal cancer treated with first-line chemotherapy.
Article in British journal of cancer, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundHER2-positive or ERBB2 amplified (ERBB2 amp+) metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) is an important subgroup due to emerging HER2-targeted therapies. Although ERBB2 amplification is associated with anti-EGFR antibody resistance, optimal first-line treatment remains unclear.
methodsWe analysed data from the Flatiron Health-Foundation Medicine CRC clinico-genomic database, including patients with stage IV or recurrent mCRC diagnosed between January 2012 and March 2022 who underwent tissue-based comprehensive genomic profiling. ERBB2 amp+ was defined as an ERBB2 copy number ≥+3 of the tumour base ploidy.
resultsAmong 5545 patients, 144 (3.1%) had ERBB2 amp+ mCRC. These patients showed significantly worse real-world progression-free survival (rwPFS) than ERBB2 amp- patients (median 7.6 vs. 8.7 months; hazard ratio [HR]: 1.20, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.01-1.43, p = 0.04). This trend persisted in patients with left-sided RAS/BRAF V600E wild-type and non-MSI-H mCRC treated with chemotherapy plus anti-EGFR antibody (median 8.7 vs. 12.5 months; HR: 2.18, p = 0.02; adjusted HR: 2.33, p = 0.046) or chemotherapy plus bevacizumab (median 8.9 vs. 10.5 months; HR: 1.65, p = 0.04; adjusted HR: 1.75, p = 0.04). Real-world overall survival did not differ significantly.
conclusionERBB2 amp+ mCRC is a small but clinically relevant subgroup with inferior rwPFS across current first-line treatments, highlighting the need for better strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.