ArticleScientific reports2025
AI-driven intrusion detection and lightweight authentication framework for secure and efficient medical sensor networks.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Maintaining the confidentiality and integrity of data in Medical Sensor Networks (MSNs) is an important issue due to limited computational resources and the rising risk of cyber-attacks. Traditional security solutions do not offer real-time security but do use minimal energy. In this work, an AI-driven security system is introduced, which comprises the Convolutional Neural Network (CNN)-based Intrusion Detection System (IDS), the dynamic Trust Management System (TMS), and the lightweight Elliptic Curve Cryptography (ECC)-based authentication protocol to increase the security and reliability of MSNs. With the Umas dataset, a supervised CNN model was trained to predict network anomalies, and TMS dynamically generated trust scores of network devices. The authentication protocol, which is based on ECC, was analyzed and designed formally (with the help of BAN logic and ProVerif) and informally to assess its robustness and efficiency. The proposed framework is 95% accurate, which is better than the known IDS models by 8–10%, and its latency is one-twelfth. Its computational overhead is 1/15 to 1/16 that of the existing models. The lightweight authentication scheme was deemed very useful in withstanding replay, impersonation, man-in-the-middle, and eavesdropping attacks. Nonetheless, it consumed 10% more energy than contemporary state-of-the-art methods. The CNN-TMS-ECC model provides a safe, low-latency, and energy-efficient security solution for medical devices, enabling effective communication and real-time intrusion detection in smart healthcare systems.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.