ArticleScientific reports2025
A novel biomarker for identifying HER2-low breast cancer using synthetic MRI.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Multiparametric MRI and artificial intelligence for non-invasive HER2 assessment in breast cancer: a comprehensive review.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
A total of 150 patients with pathologically confirmed unilateral invasive breast cancer who underwent preoperative 3.0T MRI (including SyMRI sequences) at our institution were enrolled in the development set, while an external validation cohort consisted of 98 patients from Yidu Central Hospital. Based on IHC/FISH results, patients were categorized into HER2-low, HER2-zero and HER2-over groups. Two radiologists independently measured T1, T2, PD, and ADC values of the lesions. Logistic regression analysis was employed to identify the most effective predictors of HER2 expression status, and ROC curve analysis was performed to evaluate their discriminative ability. Univariate logistic regression indicated that the T2 value was a significant predictor for differentiating HER2 expression status. In the development set, T2 values demonstrated moderate diagnostic performance, with AUC values of 0.813 for HER2-low vs. over, 0.816 for HER2-zero vs. over and 0.876 for HER2-zero vs. low. Similarly, in the external validation set, T2 values showed moderate diagnostic efficacy, with AUCs of 0.837, 0.808 and 0.835 for the respective comparisons. T2 quantification derived from SyMRI shows promise as a noninvasive biomarker for identifying HER2-low-expressing breast cancer, supporting its potential role in guiding individualized treatment strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.