Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41360975›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Consensus-driven feature selection for transparent and robust loan default prediction.

Ghazi Abbas, Zhou Ying, Majid Ayoubi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Ghazi AbbasSchool of Economics and Management, Dalian University of Technology, Dalian City, 116024, China.
Zhou YingSchool of Economics and Management, Dalian University of Technology, Dalian City, 116024, China. zhouying@dlut.edu.cn.
Majid AyoubiComputer Science Faculty, Kabul University, Kabul, Afghanistan. ayoubi.m@ku.edu.af.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Accurate loan default prediction is essential for financial stability and inclusion, yet remains challenging due to high-dimensional, imbalanced, and heterogeneous borrower data. Traditional feature selection methods often suffer from redundancy, dominance, and instability, leading to suboptimal, less interpretable models. To address these challenges, we propose a Hybrid Rank-Aggregated Feature Selection (HRA-FS) framework that integrates ReliefF, Recursive Feature Elimination, and ElasticNet through Borda count aggregation. Our study incorporates strategic feature categorization to mitigate domain dominance, ensuring balanced representation across risk drivers. This consensus-driven, category-aware aggregation enhances interpretability by identifying features consistently supported across distinct selection logics, producing concise, non-redundant subsets that are easier to explain, and ensuring representation of diverse risk domains linked to economically meaningful constructs. Evaluated on real-world imbalanced datasets of 2044 Chinese farmers and 3045 small firms, using XGBoost, HRA-FS consistently outperforms all single FS methods, achieving a ROC-AUC of 0.965 for firms. The technique identifies compact, predictive feature sets, including critical attributes such as house value and inventory turnover rate. Our findings demonstrate that this consensus-driven approach resolves the trilemma of accuracy, stability, and interpretability, offering lenders robust tools for equitable credit assessment and fostering inclusive financial ecosystems.

Indexed as

Feature selectionInterpretabilityLoan default predictionRank aggregationXGBoost

Identifiers

PMID41360975
PMCPMC12796216

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.