ArticleScientific reports2025
Consensus-driven feature selection for transparent and robust loan default prediction.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Accurate loan default prediction is essential for financial stability and inclusion, yet remains challenging due to high-dimensional, imbalanced, and heterogeneous borrower data. Traditional feature selection methods often suffer from redundancy, dominance, and instability, leading to suboptimal, less interpretable models. To address these challenges, we propose a Hybrid Rank-Aggregated Feature Selection (HRA-FS) framework that integrates ReliefF, Recursive Feature Elimination, and ElasticNet through Borda count aggregation. Our study incorporates strategic feature categorization to mitigate domain dominance, ensuring balanced representation across risk drivers. This consensus-driven, category-aware aggregation enhances interpretability by identifying features consistently supported across distinct selection logics, producing concise, non-redundant subsets that are easier to explain, and ensuring representation of diverse risk domains linked to economically meaningful constructs. Evaluated on real-world imbalanced datasets of 2044 Chinese farmers and 3045 small firms, using XGBoost, HRA-FS consistently outperforms all single FS methods, achieving a ROC-AUC of 0.965 for firms. The technique identifies compact, predictive feature sets, including critical attributes such as house value and inventory turnover rate. Our findings demonstrate that this consensus-driven approach resolves the trilemma of accuracy, stability, and interpretability, offering lenders robust tools for equitable credit assessment and fostering inclusive financial ecosystems.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.