ArticleCommunications chemistry2025
Deep learning model of post-translational modification regulating liquid-liquid phase separation.
Article in Communications chemistry, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Rethinking bioinformatics in liquid-liquid phase separation: data resources, predictive models, and an event-centric perspective.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Liquid-liquid phase separation (LLPS) drives the formation of various membraneless organelles, which are crucial for biological processes and disease development. Despite the significant regulatory effects on LLPS of protein post-translational modifications (PTMs), specific data resource and predictor are still lacking. First, we constructed a well-curated database of PTM regulation on liquid-liquid Phase Separation (PTMPhaSe) ( https://ptmphase.sjtu.edu.cn ) that contains manually curated complete experimental evidence. Second, we developed graph neural network-based deep learning model (named PhosLLPS) to predict functional phosphorylation sites regulating LLPS, which achieved better identification performance (AUC = 0.9116) than four baseline models and the existing FuncPhos-SEQ method. Meanwhile, human proteome-scale predictions for functional phosphorylation sites were performed with PhosLLPS. PhosLLPS is now freely available in web server ( https://ptmphase.sjtu.edu.cn/Predictor ). By bridging the gap between PTM regulation and LLPS, these resources could contribute to a better understanding of the molecular function of LLPS and facilitate further drug development for LLPS-related diseases.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.