ArticleScientific reports2025
Synergistic effects of fly ash, ground granulated blast furnace slag, and graphene oxide in low-carbon concrete: modelling, optimization, and sustainability assessment.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The most widely used building material in the world is conventional concrete having high carbon footprint and highly dependent on natural resources. To overcome these challenges the present study focuses on the designing and assessing the performance of low-carbon concrete mixes using fly ash (FA), ground granulated blast furnace slag (GGBS) and graphene oxide (GO), various tests were performed to investigate the mechanical properties, microstructural characteristics and sustainable assessment of the developed mixes. Response surface methodology (RSM) was used to design the mixes incorporating 20% FA, varying GGBS (5-15%) and GO (0.02-0.08%). Among the developed mixes, mix with 15% GGBS and 0.05% GO an improvement was observed with an increase of 25.55%, 19.37%, 15.95% and 10.76% for compressive strength, flexural strength, modulus of elasticity and poisson's ratio respectively compared to control mix although addition of GO reduced slump of concrete mixes. FESEM images supported the experimental findings with dense microstructure of mixes with GGBS and GO. Models developed through RSM possessed high R
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.