Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41360930›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Real-world survey on utilization of central antitussives and its health impact in patients with subacute and chronic cough in Japan.

Junpei Saito, Shotaro Maeda

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Junpei SaitoDepartment of Pulmonary Medicine, Fukushima Medical University, Fukushima, Japan.
Shotaro MaedaMedical Affairs, Kyorin Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., Tokyo, Japan. shoutaro.maeda@mb.kyorin-pharm.co.jp.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite guideline recommendations against the long-term use of central antitussives, actual clinical practice remains unclear. We aimed to investigate prescription patterns of central antitussives in patients with cough using Japanese claims data. In this retrospective cohort study, we evaluated patients aged ≥ 20 years with subacute and chronic cough from IQVIA Claims database. The primary outcome was the number of days central antitussives were prescribed. Additionally, we examined co-occurrence patterns of comorbidities and adverse events, specifically nausea and constipation, in relation to the duration of central antitussive prescription. Among 10,385 patients with subacute/chronic cough, 4431 (42.7%) were prescribed central antitussives. A longer duration of central antitussives prescription was significantly associated with a higher frequency of comorbidities. Specifically, the proportion of bronchial asthma/cough variant asthma, allergic rhinitis/chronic rhinosinusitis, and gastroesophageal reflux disease increased with the number of prescribed days of central antitussive. Adjusted odds ratio (95%CI) for constipation and nausea were 1.80 (1.18-2.76) and 2.06 (1.15-3.70), respectively, in patients prescribed central antitussives for > 57 days compared to those prescribed for 0-28 days. Appropriate treatment of comorbidities and prescription of central antitussives are warranted.

Indexed as

Antitussive AgentsCoughAdultAgedChronic CoughChronic DiseaseComorbidityConstipationFemaleGastroesophageal RefluxHumansJapanMaleMiddle AgedNauseaRetrospective StudiesAntitussive AgentsAdverse eventCentral antitussivesChronic coughComorbidityReal world dataSubacute cough

Identifiers

PMID41360930
PMCPMC12789445

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.