ArticleScientific reports2025
Feedforward control with personalized nursing measures on respiratory function and psychological status in patients with advanced lung cancer.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
To explore the intervention effect of feedforward control combined with personalized nursing on cancer pain, respiratory function and psychological state in advanced lung cancer patients. Data of 134 patients with stage III-IV lung cancer from December 2021 to December 2022 were retrospectively analyzed. Following the nursing plan, they were divided into experimental group (feedforward control combined with personalized nursing) and reference group (feedforward control nursing) (n = 67). The pain score (NRS), respiratory function index (FVC, FEV1, FEV1/FVC), mental state (SDS, SAS), cancer-related fatigue score, quality of life and nursing satisfaction were compared between the two groups before and after the intervention. The nursing satisfaction of the experimental group (97.04%) was higher than that of the reference group (83.58%) (P < 0.05). After the intervention, the pain score, SDS, SAS and cancer-related fatigue scores of the experimental group were lower than those of the reference group (P < 0.001), while the respiratory function indexes (FVC, FEV1, FEV1/FVC) and quality of life scores were higher than those of the reference group (P < 0.001). Thus, feedforward control combined with personalized nursing effectively relieved cancer pain in patients with advanced lung cancer, improve respiratory function and psychological state and enhance nursing quality and satisfaction, which had clinical promotion value.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.