Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41360884›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Combined effect of biochar, manure and compost on canola growth, yield parameters and soil chemical properties.

Masooma Hassan, Vladimir Strezov

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Masooma HassanSchool of Natural Sciences, Faculty of Science and Engineering, Macquarie University, Sydney, NSW, 2109, Australia.
Vladimir StrezovSchool of Natural Sciences, Faculty of Science and Engineering, Macquarie University, Sydney, NSW, 2109, Australia. vladimir.strezov@mq.edu.au.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Agricultural productivity relies on several factors where soil fertility and health are some of the vital concerns that need to be addressed. Excessive use of chemical fertilizers can result in significant contamination of soil and other environmental media. The use of organic amendments, such as biochar, compost, manure and their combination, can serve as cost effective and environmentally friendly strategy for healthy soil management. The present study was designed to evaluate the impact of different organic amendments on canola growth and yield. Four soil types, namely loamy sand (LS), sandy loam (SL), silty clay (SC) and loam were used for cultivation of canola. Silty clay was found to produce the highest flower count and seeds’ weight, while slightly higher number of seeds per pod were detected in loam. Biochar alone produced better results on flower count and 100 seeds weight, while among the combination treatments manure + compost + biochar, manure + biochar and compost + biochar showed positive impact on the number of pods and 100 seeds weight. Organic treatments, soil types and their interaction significantly impacted carbon, nitrogen (N), potassium (K) and phosphorus (P) concentrations in all soil types compared to controls. pH was found to be a limiting factor affecting shoot length, canola pods and 100 seeds weight.

Indexed as

Brassica napusCharcoalCompostingManureSoilAgricultureCarbonFertilizersNitrogenPhosphorusPotassiumSeedsbiocharCarbonCharcoalFertilizersManureNitrogenPhosphorusPotassiumSoilBiocharCompostManureOrganic amendmentsSoil fertilitySoil propertiesSoil types

Identifiers

PMID41360884
PMCPMC12685962

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.