Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41360847›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Pearson correlation-based clustering with collaborative task allocation in 5G Industrial Internet of Things divergent health networks.

Krishnakumar Vaithianathan, Julian Benadit Pernabas, Manjunath Ramanna Lamani, K Venkatachalam, S S Askar, Mohamed Abouhawwash

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Krishnakumar VaithianathanDepartment of Computer Engineering, Karaikal Polytechnic College, Varichikudy, Karaikal, 609609, Puducherry, India.
Julian Benadit PernabasDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering, CHRIST (Deemed to be University), Kengeri Campus, Bangalore, 560074, Karnataka, India.
Manjunath Ramanna LamaniDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering, Moodlakatte Institute of Technology Kundapura, Moodalkatte, 576217, Karnataka, India.
K VenkatachalamDepartment of Applied Cybernetics, Faculty of Science, University of Hradec Králové, Hradec Králové, 50003, Czech Republic. venkatme83@gmail.com.
S S AskarDepartment of Statistics and Operations Research, College of Science, King Saud University, P.O. Box 2455, Riyadh, 11451, Saudi Arabia. saskar@ksu.edu.sa.
Mohamed AbouhawwashDepartment of Industrial and Systems Engineering, King Fahd University of Petroleum & Minerals, Dhahran, 31261, Saudi Arabia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Simultaneous task allocation is crucial for enhancing service quality in Industrial Internet of Things (IIoT) environments. The distribution and management of tasks remain among the biggest challenges in the IIoT era. Efficient allocation strategies are needed to enable transparent network configurations and maximize task throughput. Although recent methods address the dynamic management of objects, they often overlook the correlations between tasks and their associated functionalities. This paper introduces a novel Connected Harmonical Adaptive Task Allocation (CHATA) model for IIoT health networks to ensure fair task distribution. CHATA leverages similarity measures of object functionalities to identify the most suitable object to perform each task. Simulations conducted in NS-3 demonstrate that CHATA achieves up to 90% allocation efficiency in 5G Radio Access Technologies IIoT health environments and significantly outperforms recent approaches in task assignment performance.

Indexed as

5GClusteringIIoT-healthTask allocation

Identifiers

PMID41360847
PMCPMC12686448

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.