ArticleScientific reports2025
Evaluation of climate prediction models in Yunnan, China: traditional methods and AI approaches.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Influenza-Like Illness Forecasting Using Multisource Data: Comparative Deep Learning Study.JMIR medical informatics · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Understanding regional climate variability is essential for effective climate risk management, particularly in areas with complex terrain like Yunnan Province, China. Traditional regional climate models (RCMs), such as RegCM, face limitations in predictive accuracy and computational efficiency due to their reliance on nonlinear physical simulations. To address these challenges, this study introduces a comprehensive framework to evaluate regional climate predictions using artificial intelligence (AI) models. Specifically, we assess the performance of five mainstream AI models-CNN, LSTM, Transformer, CNN-LSTM, and LSTM-Transformer-in predicting key climate variables: temperature, precipitation, and relative humidity. Daily meteorological observations from 25 national stations (2004-2018) were employed, with dimensionality reduction and temporal feature encoding enhancing the sequence-based learning models. Model performance was evaluated using RMSE, MAE, and Pearson correlation coefficient (R). The results demonstrate that AI models substantially outperform RegCM, particularly for temperature and humidity predictions. Among them, the LSTM-Transformer achieved the highest accuracy in temperature (RMSE = 0.7410, R = 0.9938) and humidity (RMSE = 3.7054, R = 0.9710), while CNN-LSTM was most effective for precipitation (RMSE = 4.7260, R = 0.8559). These findings highlight the potential of artificial intelligence for advancing multivariate climate prediction in regions with significant spatial heterogeneity, providing a data-driven basis for more accurate climate risk assessment and early warning applications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.