ArticleScientific reports2025
COVID-19 severity analysis for clinical decision support based on machine learning approach.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Association of Clinical Characteristics, Hematological Indices, and Acute Inflammatory Markers in Hospitalized COVID-19 Patients with Disease Severity and Mortality: A Single-center Retrospective Study.Saudi journal of medicine & medical sciencesArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The COVID-19 pandemic has placed immense pressure on global healthcare systems, underscoring the urgent need for early and accurate prediction of disease severity to improve patient care and optimize resource allocation. Failure in ward allocation can lead to wasted hospital resources and inadequate treatment. This study analyzes data from 806 COVID-19 patients admitted to the emergency room of Chungbuk National University Hospital, Korea, between January 2021 and December 2022, to develop machine learning models that predict which patients should be prioritized for intensive care unit (ICU) placement based on initial clinical information. Additionally, two different severity criteria were considered based on actual ICU level interventions (Criterion I) and based on national policy definitions (Criterion II). Single models of logistic regression, random forest, support vector machine, light gradient boosting, and extreme gradient boosting, as well as ensemble learning models using voting classifiers, were used. The ensemble model achieved the best performance, with recall rates of 96.2% and 88.2% for each criterion, respectively. Key features such as glucose level, neutrophil count, high sensitivity C-reactive protein (hsCRP) level, and albumin level were identified, improving model interpretability. This study provides valuable insights for healthcare professionals to support effective early ward allocation and treatment strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.