ArticleScientific reports2025
Identification of a super enhancer associated gene signature for the prognosis prediction and regulatory mechanism exploration in breast cancer.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
23 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This study aims to preliminarily explore the impact of super-enhancer (SE)-associated genes on breast cancer (BC) and their potential regulatory mechanisms. We first identified differentially expressed SE-associated genes between BC patients and healthy controls. Subsequently, Cox regression analysis and the Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator (LASSO) algorithm were applied to evacuate SE-associated genes that related to the overall survival (OS) of patients. The Super-Enhancer-Related Score (SERS) was then calculated based on the LASSO coefficients and incorporated with clinical features to construct a clinical prediction model. Besides, we applied multiple bioinformatic approaches to investigate the potential regulatory mechanism of SE-associated genes using bulk RNA and single-cell RNA sequencing data. Finally, the hub gene was identified using various machine learning methods and Immunohistochemistry (IHC) assay. We found that SERS was negatively correlated with OS of BC patients. Both time-dependent ROC analysis and calibration curves demonstrated the strong predictive ability and high accuracy of the prediction model we built. Significant differences were observed between the two groups in terms of tumor mutation burden, tumor immune microenvironment, and drug sensitivity. Importantly, we identified TFF1 as the core gene, and the immunohistochemical (IHC) assay using the tissue microarray revealed that TFF1-positive patients had significantly better OS than their counterparts. We constructed a highly precise clinical prediction model based on SERS, demonstrating the impact of SE-associated genes on the prognosis of BC patients and their regulatory effects on somatic mutations, tumor immune microenvironment, and drug sensitivity in BC.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.