ArticleCell death & disease2025
Programmed cell death pathways coordinate neutrophil and macrophage clearance in zebrafish and are differentially exploited by Salmonella Typhimurium.
Article in Cell death & disease, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Review
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Programmed cell death (PCD) is essential for immune cell homeostasis and host defense, yet its role in neutrophil and macrophage elimination during bacterial infections remains poorly understood. Using the zebrafish model, which offers unique in vivo imaging and genetic manipulation advantages, we dissected the contribution of pyroptosis, apoptosis, and necroptosis to the regulation of neutrophil and macrophage fate during homeostasis and infection with Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium (ST). Under basal conditions, all three PCD pathways cooperated to control immune cell turnover. Upon infection, zebrafish larvae mounted a type III secretion system (T3SS)-independent emergency myelopoietic response that increased myeloid cell numbers. However, the pathogen rapidly counteracted this response by promoting neutrophil death through Nlrp3-mediated pyroptosis and Caspase-3-dependent apoptosis, and macrophage killing via Ripk1-dependent necroptosis-both driven by its T3SS. While blocking pyroptosis prevented neutrophil loss, it also increased host susceptibility due to impaired bacterial clearance, whereas inhibition of apoptosis or necroptosis enhanced resistance, as these pathways are dispensable for controlling infection. These findings demonstrate how ST exploits distinct PDC mechanisms to evade innate immunity and underscore their differential potential as therapeutic targets in intracellular bacterial infections.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.