ArticleBMJ paediatrics open2025
Medical neglect in Canada: a cross-sectional study exploring drivers of substantiation using a national dataset.
Article in BMJ paediatrics open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThis study explores child welfare investigations for medical neglect in Canada, focusing on household, family and child characteristics and drivers of substantiated victimisation.
methodsData from the Canadian Incidence Study of Reported Child Abuse and Neglect 2019 (CIS-2019), the most recent source of Canadian data on child maltreatment-related investigations, were used. A multistaged sampling design was used in the CIS-2019 to select a representative sample of child welfare agencies, and data were collected from investigating child welfare workers at selected agencies over a 3-month sampling period. Complex survey design weights were used to derive an annual estimate of maltreatment-related investigations conducted in the country (299 171 investigations involving children aged 0-15 years). The current study specifically examined the characteristics of the estimated 2934 investigations for medical neglect in the CIS-2019 (1% of all investigations). Bivariate analyses compared medical neglect investigations with investigations involving other forms of neglect, and a binary logistic regression identified characteristics associated with substantiation of medical neglect.
resultsCompared with other neglect investigations, medical neglect investigations were more likely to involve children less than 1 year old, caregivers under 21 years old and over 30 years old, households whose primary source of income was full-time work, primary caregivers with mental health concerns, and children with at least one functioning concern. Medical neglect investigations in which the primary caregiver had noted alcohol abuse (OR=4.693, p<0.001), drug/solvent abuse (OR=2.485, p<0.001) or mental health concerns (OR=2.231, p<0.001) were more likely to be substantiated.
conclusionsMedical neglect is a child welfare concern with potentially dire consequences. We demonstrate that substantiated cases of medical neglect in Canada arise within the context of complex caregiver and child factors. Early collaboration, preventative efforts and supportive relationships between families and their healthcare teams could enhance adherence to medical recommendations and mitigate harm to the child.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.