ArticleInternational journal of spine surgery2025
What Is the Impact of Single-Photon Emission Computed Tomography on the Management of Degenerative Cervical and Lumbar Spine Disease? A Single-Institution Study.
Article in International journal of spine surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundSPECT-CT highlights metabolic activity within skeletal structures, including degenerative arthropathies and other potentially pain-producing abnormalities.
objectivesInvestigate the effectiveness of single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT-CT) in identifying pain generators and assess its role in clinical and surgical decision-making and planning.
methodsProspective study of 110 patients presenting with neck and back pain. SPECT-CT was ordered to identify pain generators and/or guide surgical planning. Pre- and post-SPECT-CT surveys were obtained to assess pain generator identification and subsequent changes to treatment recommendations.
resultsSPECT-CT demonstrated increased uptake in areas corresponding to clinical symptoms in 78.1% of patients. This increased diagnostic specificity reduced the number of diagnostic possibilities per patient and led to a changed diagnosis in 68.1% of patients and a changed treatment plan in 62.7%. The nonoperative group was more likely to have specific, identified targets for injections after SPECT-CT. In 57.7% of surgical candidates, the surgical plan was altered, with 11 patients (42.3%) receiving surgical treatment recommendations involving fewer surgical levels and 4 (15.3%) involving more surgical levels.
conclusionsSPECT-CT appears to be a valuable diagnostic tool in assessing neck and back pain. It may help identify pain generators and limit the need for further diagnostic workup. It was impactful in guiding treatment strategies and potentially improved surgical planning by specifically targeting the affected areas. Further research is needed to validate these findings and establish clinical guidelines for their use in patients with neck and back pain. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4:
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.