Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41360485›Full record

ReviewBMJ global health2025

Global health and the dialectics of solidarity through Ubuntu and European perspectives.

Chukwuemeka L Anyikwa

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in BMJ global health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Chukwuemeka L AnyikwaCollege of Medicine, University of Nigeria, Ituku Ozalla, Enugu, Nigeria anyikwaemeka@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0003-1552-2111

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The concept of solidarity plays a central role in shaping both African and European cultural responses to social and political challenges, although its interpretations diverge significantly. In African societies, solidarity is rooted in the relational philosophy of ubuntu, where individual identity is understood as inseparable from the community, emphasising collective well-being and mutual care. This is reflected in practices, such as community-based caregiving for the sick and elderly, traditional healing networks and shared child-rearing. In parts of West Africa, for example among the Igbo, co-wives may sleep over at the home of a bereaved wife to provide emotional support and boost morale during mourning.In contrast, European models of solidarity are often institutionalised and rights-based, focusing on balancing individual autonomy with collective welfare within legal frameworks. This paper explores these two distinct approaches to solidarity and examines their implications in global health, especially in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic and other global health crises. Ubuntu's emphasis on communal responsibility offers a valuable framework for addressing health inequities, suggesting that global health is a shared responsibility that transcends national borders and individual interests. Conversely, European solidarity, shaped by enlightenment principles and liberal democratic traditions, often prioritises individual rights and institutional mechanisms to ensure health equity. This dialectical exploration highlights the evolving nature of solidarity in a globalised world, where African and European models of solidarity are increasingly hybridised to address global health disparities. Drawing on examples such as the Ritshidze community-led HIV care monitoring initiative in South Africa, alongside international efforts like COVAX, this paper evaluates how solidarity, in both its African and European forms, can influence global health policy and collective action, promoting more inclusive and equitable health systems worldwide.

Indexed as

Global HealthSocial ResponsibilityCOVID-19EuropeHumansInternational CooperationPandemicsSARS-CoV-2Global HealthHealth policies and all other topics

Identifiers

PMID41360485
PMCPMC12684094

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.