ArticleBMJ open2025
Positive health programme for British South Asian women with postnatal depression: a multiperspective qualitative study.
Article in BMJ open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesTo explore the views and perspectives of British South Asian (BSA) women and Positive Health Programme (PHP) facilitators on the usefulness and experiences of the PHP intervention for managing postnatal depression (PND) in primary care settings.
designQualitative study with semi-structured interviews to explore perceptions of acceptability and implementation. A patient and public involvement group provided their insights and feedback on study topic guides, analysis and outcomes. SETTING AND
participantsWe sampled trial participants from the PHP intervention database to ensure variation in geographic setting, age, socioeconomic status and ethnicity. PHP facilitators involved in the trial were also invited to participate in an interview.Interviews with study participants were conducted at participants' homes, and community centres, or via phone. Interviews with PHP facilitators were conducted via phone or online. Interview recordings were transcribed verbatim and analysed using thematic analysis and subsequently the Theoretical Framework of Acceptability (TFA) was applied. Recruitment took place between February 2017 and March 2020.
resultsThirty interviews were conducted-19 trial participants and 11 PHP facilitators. The PHP intervention was viewed positively, with appreciation of its therapeutic content and components such as childcare and refreshments that facilitated engagement. Participants reported improved confidence and well-being and supported their needs. Participants understood the intervention's purpose. Both intervention participants and facilitators noted strengthened self-efficacy.Some participants experienced difficulties balancing childcare and attendance, implying a need for logistical assistance. Stigma about mental health in the BSA community was viewed as persistent, recommending future programmes efforts on strategies to reduce stigma and develop supportive environment.
conclusionThis study demonstrates the possibility of PHP intervention being integrated into routine care by providing culturally tailored support for BSA women with PND, primarily through family engagement and facilitator support. Future research on scalability, alongside community engagement efforts, will strengthen its acceptability and broader applicability. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ISRCTN10697380.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.