Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41360004›Full record

ArticleHuman factors2026

Does the Directive to Avoid Low Back Flexion Hinder Physical Performance? Examining Isometric Strength in Postures Adopted During Light Mass Lifting.

Brendan L Pinto, Tyson A C Beach, Jack P Callaghan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Human factors, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Brendan L PintoUniversity of Waterloo, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-0412-4663
Tyson A C BeachUniversity of Waterloo, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-0925-3018
Jack P CallaghanUniversity of Waterloo, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

ObjectiveObserve how instruction to avoid rounding the low back while lifting a relatively light mass impacts isometric lifting strength.BackgroundAs opposed to manual materials handling training directives recommending whole-body techniques such as a squat lift, targeting specific body regions such as low back curvature, theoretically affords workers greater flexibility to organize the rest of the body to reduce musculoskeletal loading without reducing physical performance. However, providing these directives during sub-maximal tasks may not prompt prioritization of physical performance as individuals self-organize, eventually making the intervention ineffective.MethodsForty participants (50% female) lifted a crate with and without the instruction to avoid rounding the low back. Postures at the initiation of crate lifting were replicated to test isometric strength.ResultsAt the group-level, instruction decreased low back flexion (

Indexed as

Isometric ContractionLiftingLumbosacral RegionMuscle StrengthPhysical Functional PerformancePostureAdultBiomechanical PhenomenaFemaleHumansMaleYoung Adultcoachcueinstructionmanual materials handling trainingspine

Identifiers

PMID41360004
PMCPMC12909609

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.