Observational studyActa anaesthesiologica Scandinavica2026
Association of Cerebral Oxygenation During Prehospital Anaesthesia and Functional Outcome: A Prospective, Observational Multi-Centre Cohort Study of 1014 Patients.
Observational study in Acta anaesthesiologica Scandinavica, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04144803 (Brain Oxygenation During Prehospital Anesthesia), which is not on this map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Brain Oxygenation During Prehospital Anesthesia: an Observational Study (The BOPRA Study)
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Cerebral blood flow autoregulation during prehospital post-resuscitation care.Resuscitation plus · 2026Article
- Association of Cerebral Oxygenation During Prehospital Anaesthesia and Functional Outcome: A Prospective, Observational Multi-Centre Cohort Study of 1014 Patients.Acta anaesthesiologica Scandinavica · 2026Observational
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundMany patients undergoing prehospital anaesthesia may be at risk of inadequate cerebral oxygenation due to underlying conditions or adverse events like hypotension or hypoxia. This study examined whether a decrease in regional cerebral oxygen saturation (rSO
methodsWe conducted a prospective, observational study including adult patients anaesthetised by six prehospital critical care teams. A relative cerebral desaturation event (rCDE) was defined as a ≥ 10% decrease in rSO
resultsAmong 1014 patients, 199 experienced an rCDE, with 125 (63%) having supraphysiological baseline. rCDE was not associated with outcomes. Of 182 patients with aCDE, 30-day favourable outcomes were not significantly different (30% vs. 36%, p = 0.14, adjusted OR 0.92, 95% confidence interval 0.62-1.34). However, aCDE was associated with lower 30-day survival (46% vs. 58%, p = 0.006) and less favourable 1-year outcomes (31% vs. 41%, p = 0.043). Adjusted analyses showed no significant associations.
conclusionAn rCDE was not associated with worse functional outcomes. While aCDEs were linked to unfavourable outcomes in unadjusted analyses, these associations were not significant after adjustment, highlighting the complexity of interpreting NIRS in heterogeneous populations. Condition-specific studies are needed to clarify its role. EDITORIAL COMMENT: Cerebral oxygen delivery may be jeopardized in critically ill patients undergoing prehospital anaesthesia. This study assessed near-infrared spectroscopy on the forehead in a large number of cases requiring general anaesthesia and subsequent transportation to hospital by helicopter. In unadjusted analysis, patients with an at least 10% decline in forehead saturation had higher survival and better functional outcome, whereas those with a forehead saturation below 60% had lower survival and worse functional outcome. Upon multivariable regression, age, patient category, systemic oxygen saturation and Glasgow Coma Scale score were independent predictors of worse outcomes, but forehead oxygen saturation was not. NIRS-measured forehead saturation decrease appears to associate in a complex fashion with more traditional predictors of patient outcomes. Whether effects of resuscitation interventions like these can be assessed reliably by NIRS is not yet well understood.
trial registrationThe study protocol was published beforehand on clinicaltrials.gov (NCT04144803) on 7th October 2019.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.