ArticleJMIR diabetes2025
Insulin Injection Technique Education and Associated Knowledge Factors Among Physicians: Cross-Sectional Survey Study.
Article in JMIR diabetes, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Insulin therapy is crucial for managing type 2 diabetes mellitus, with its use steadily increasing in Indonesia and its effectiveness well established. However, prescribing insulin poses various challenges that can impact the effectiveness of insulin. Patient education is crucial for the successful implementation of insulin therapy. Proper insulin use remains insufficient in Indonesia. Objective: This study aims to investigate physicians' knowledge and practice in providing education on insulin use to patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus in Indonesia. Methods: This study recruited potential participants (all physicians in Indonesia) through the internet using a convenience sampling method. The participants were asked to fill out a questionnaire. The questionnaire had 32 questions divided into 4 sections: demographics and clinical practice, practice of insulin education, the Indonesian insulin injection technique guideline, and knowledge of insulin injection techniques. The instrument used in this study was developed based on the Pedoman Teknik Menyuntik Insulin Indonesia, which was adapted from the international consensus by the Forum for Injection Technique and Therapy Expert Recommendations. The survey lasted from February 2021 to March 2021. Data were analyzed using the Kruskal-Wallis tests. Results: A total of 823 participants were included in the analysis. Out of 823 participants, 680 (82.6%) had given insulin education to patients at least once during the last 30 days. However, out of 823 participants, only 479 (58.2%) used specific guidelines in their practice, with only 280 (34.0%) aware of the Indonesian guidelines. Out of 823 participants, 815 (99.1%) agreed that insulin injection techniques would affect clinical results. The median score of knowledge about insulin injection techniques was 7 (IQR 2) among the study participants, indicating good knowledge. Profession was the only variable significantly associated with knowledge scores, with consultants in endocrinology, metabolism, and diabetes achieving the highest median scores, and other physicians the lowest (P<.001). Conclusions: Most physicians in this study reported providing education to their patients. However, there was still a gap between the guidelines and the practice of insulin education, as indicated by the lack of awareness and a fair level of knowledge about the Indonesian guidelines.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.