Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41359867›Full record

ArticleJMIR rehabilitation and assistive technologies2025

Comparison of Body Weight Support-Assisted Balance and Gait Training With or Without Balance Perturbations in Poststroke Rehabilitation: Multisite Randomized Controlled Trial.

Pete Grevelding, Amanda Meyer, John Corbett, Kaitlyn Rudolf, Emily Meise, Caitlin Boland, Camille Grzelak, Henry Charles Hrdlicka

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR rehabilitation and assistive technologies, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Pete GreveldingMilne Institute for Healthcare Innovation, Gaylord Hospital, 50 Gaylord Farm Road, PO Box 400, Wallingford, CT, 06492, United States, 1 203-284-2864.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7734-3608
Amanda MeyerInpatient Occupational Therapy, Hartford Hospital, Hartford, CT, United States.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9878-8040
John CorbettMilne Institute for Healthcare Innovation, Gaylord Hospital, 50 Gaylord Farm Road, PO Box 400, Wallingford, CT, 06492, United States, 1 203-284-2864.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9593-6415
Kaitlyn RudolfInpatient Physical Therapy, Gaylord Hospital, Wallingford, CT, United States.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6253-2940
Emily MeiseMilne Institute for Healthcare Innovation, Gaylord Hospital, 50 Gaylord Farm Road, PO Box 400, Wallingford, CT, 06492, United States, 1 203-284-2864.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7177-8766
Caitlin BolandInpatient Physical Therapy, Gaylord Hospital, Wallingford, CT, United States.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0001-6091-3202
Camille GrzelakInpatient Physical Therapy, MedStar National Rehabilitation Hospital, Washington, DC, United States.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0009-0796-5749
Henry Charles HrdlickaMilne Institute for Healthcare Innovation, Gaylord Hospital, 50 Gaylord Farm Road, PO Box 400, Wallingford, CT, 06492, United States, 1 203-284-2864.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7014-7919

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Impaired balance regulation after stroke puts patients and therapists at a heightened risk of injury during rehabilitation. Body weight support systems (BWSS) allow patients to safely conduct gait and balance training while minimizing risk and the fear of falling. Integrating perturbation-based balance training (PBT) modules with a BWSS may lead to further improvements. Objective: This study aimed to evaluate the impact of a ceiling-track-mounted BWSS plus an integrated PBT (BWSS-P) module on the rehabilitation of stroke-related gait and balance impairments. Methods: A multisite randomized active-comparator controlled trial was conducted. Inpatients with Berg Balance Scale (BBS) scores ≥21/56 were recruited from 4 sites. Participants completed 2-to-6 BWSS or BWSS-P study sessions. Both groups conducted the same balance and gait regimen, with the BWSS-P group also receiving 8 balance perturbations per session. BBS, Activities-Specific Balance Confidence, and 10 Meter Walk Test assessments were collected. Results: A total of 126 patients were approached with 99 yielding sufficient data for analysis. With a corrected α level of .0054, both groups showed significant in-group changes over time for all outcomes evaluated (P≤.001). However, the primary outcome measure, the BBS, did not show evidence of a difference between BWSS and BWSS-P groups over time (F1,97=1.57; P=0.21) via linear mixed effects modeling with type III Wald F test with Kenward-Roger degrees of freedom. No significant between-group differences were noted for either secondary outcome measure, the Activities-Specific Balance Confidence scale (F1,94.99=0.36; P=.55), or 10 Meter Walk Test (F1,97=4.15; P=.04). Conclusions: Although significant between-group differences were not observed, participants in both groups demonstrated similar improvements from before to after assessment. This novel PBT technology shows promise as an option for gait and balance recovery training, especially for individuals with impaired balance control or fear of falling. The BWSS-P intervention contributed positively to rehabilitation outcome overall and should be considered as a viable treatment modality when clinically appropriate.

Indexed as

acute rehabilitationambulationbalance perturbationbody weight support systemgaitlong-term acute care hospitalphysical therapypostural balancepostural perturbationstroke rehabilitation

Identifiers

PMID41359867
PMCPMC12685234

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.