Trial reportJournal of esthetic and restorative dentistry : official publication of the American Academy of Esthetic Dentistry ... [et al.]2026
Evaluating the Efficiency and Tooth Sensitivity of a Novel Whitening Strip: A Randomized, Double-Blind Controlled Trial.
Trial report in Journal of esthetic and restorative dentistry : official publication of the American Academy of Esthetic Dentistry ... [et al.], 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Efficacy and safety of low-concentration whitestrips for extrinsic tooth discoloration: a randomized controlled trial.Frontiers in oral health · 2026Trial
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveThis randomized controlled clinical trial was to evaluate the tooth whitening efficacy and tooth sensitivity of a novel whitening strips with 3% hydrogen peroxide and 1.5% potassium nitrate. MATERIALS AND
methodsNinety six participants were randomly assigned into two groups: an experimental group using LESENING Whitening Strips with 3% hydrogen peroxide and 1.5% potassium nitrate (n = 41), and the control group using Crest 3D Whitestrips only with 3% hydrogen peroxide (n = 41). Participants attached whitening strips to the teeth' buccal surface for 30 min once daily at home for 28 days continuously. Tooth sensitivity was evaluated using the Schiff score. Tooth color and color change were assessed using a spectrophotometer (CIELAB coordinates L*, a*, b*, ΔE*
resultsIn color differences (ΔE*
conclusionLESENING whitening strips with 3% hydrogen peroxide and 1.5% potassium nitrate were esthetically effective. Moreover, the LESENING group showed lower tooth sensitivity change than the Crest group. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: The use of LESENING whitening strips with 3% hydrogen peroxide and 1.5% potassium nitrate for at-home dental whitening could reduce the risk of dentin hypersensitivity without compromising whitening efficacy.
trial registrationISRCTN registry number: ISRCTN30027746.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.