ArticleHealth literacy research and practice2025
Evaluation of a Longitudinal Medical School Health Literacy Curriculum.
Article in Health literacy research and practice, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundDespite recommendations that medical schools incorporate health literacy (HL) into curricula and identification of consensus areas of HL competence, high-quality data are needed for curricular characteristics and structured evaluation that foster sustained HL competency adoption.
objectiveThis study aimed to develop and evaluate a comprehensive longitudinal medical school HL curriculum using qualitative and quantitative assessments. We sought to ground this in existing theory and provide evidence for generalizable use and further theory refinement.
methodsAcross three medical student cohorts, HL was integrated into a 14-month pre-clinical professional development course. The longitudinal curriculum was informed by consensus-derived HL competencies and Bloom's Taxonomy. Student self-assessment and reflection data were linked across three timepoints and analyzed using mixed methods: an inductive approach identified key qualitative themes; exploratory factor analysis (EFA) identified prevalent factors within self-assessments; and analysis of variance identified differences across timepoints. KEY
resultsThree qualitative themes emerged from student reflections: emotions associated with a backward reading exercise; shifts in awareness of HL as a patient challenge; and plans to continue using HL practices. Among 336 students with quantitative data across all timepoints, EFA identified three factors: foundations, shame-free environment, conveying information. Over the curriculum, students demonstrated significant (
conclusionsOur longitudinal HL curriculum, grounded in existing competencies and conceptual framework, elicited positive changes related to medical student HL competencies. Qualitative data demonstrating motivation and intention to continue applying HL practices were augmented by quantitative data showing increased adoption of self-reported behaviors over curricular timepoints. This study fulfills multiple features of a conceptual framework for HL curricula in health professions education, including sequenced, interactive sessions, multiple instruction modes, reflection, integration of knowledge and skill education, and varied assessment methods. Our findings can be used by investigators, institutions, and professional accreditation organizations to broadly enhance HL education.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.