Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41359664›Full record

ArticlePLoS computational biology2025

Neural encoding of biomechanically (im)possible human movements in occipitotemporal cortex.

Giuseppe Marrazzo, Federico De Martino, Albert Mukovskiy, Martin A Giese, Beatrice de Gelder

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS computational biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Giuseppe MarrazzoDepartment of Cognitive Neuroscience, Faculty of Psychology and Neuroscience, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Federico De MartinoDepartment of Cognitive Neuroscience, Faculty of Psychology and Neuroscience, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Albert MukovskiyHertie Institute for Clinical Brain Research and Center for Integrative Neuroscience, University Clinic Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.
Martin A GieseHertie Institute for Clinical Brain Research and Center for Integrative Neuroscience, University Clinic Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-1178-2768
Beatrice de GelderDepartment of Cognitive Neuroscience, Faculty of Psychology and Neuroscience, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-1667-8986

Funding

European Research Council (ERC) SynergyHorizon 2020 Programme H2020- FETPROACT430 2020-2
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Understanding how the human brain processes body movements is essential for clarifying the mechanisms underlying social cognition and interaction. This study investigates the encoding of biomechanically possible and impossible body movements in occipitotemporal cortex using ultra-high field 7T fMRI. By predicting the response of single voxels to impossible/possible movements using a computational modelling approach, our findings demonstrate that a combination of low-level, postural, biomechanical, and categorical features significantly predicts neural responses in the ventral visual cortex, particularly within the extrastriate body area (EBA), underscoring the brain's sensitivity to biomechanical plausibility.

Indexed as

Occipital LobeTemporal LobeAdultBiomechanical PhenomenaBrain MappingComputational BiologyFemaleHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleModels, NeurologicalMovementVisual CortexYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID41359664
PMCPMC12707666

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.