ArticlePloS one2025
High-risk human papillomavirus genotypes among women of hill districts in Bangladesh.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Knowledge on the distribution of type specific HPV (Human papillomavirus) genotypes in female cervix is crucial to identify women who are at a higher risk of developing cancer. This study aimed to find out the prevalence of High-risk HPV genotypes among women of three Hill districts of Bangladesh. This cross-sectional study was conducted between 1st January and 30th June 2024 among 1602 selected married asymptomatic tribal and nontribal women (30-60 years of age) at three Hill districts. Partial genotyping of HPV DNA specimens which detects the presence of 14 high-risk genotypes (including individual HPV-16, HPV-18, and others as a pooled group) was performed at Bangladesh Medical University (BMU). Women with previous treatment of cervical precancer and cancer, hysterectomy, cervical amputation and pregnancy were excluded. Statistical analysis utilized SPSS version 25.0, employing Chi-square and Fisher's Exact tests and P value <0.05 were considered significant. HR-HPV prevalence's were expressed as proportions. The influence of HR-HPV infection and socio-demographic factors was assessed using multinomial logistic regression analysis. The overall HR-HPV prevalence was 2.7% (n = 44) and 0.8% (n = 13) were tested positive for HPV16, 0.2% (n = 4) for HPV18 and 1.6% (n = 26) for 'Other HR-HPV' types. No significant difference of HR-HPV prevalence was observed among the three districts (p-value = 0.352) and among tribal (2.4%) and non-tribal/Bengali (3.2%) women (p-value>0.05). Higher number of marriages of the husbands have independent association with HR-HPV positivity showing an odds ratio of 2.02 (95% CI: 1.07-3.82, p = 0.030). The HR-HPV prevalence in hill districts of Bangladesh is low with independent association of higher number of marriages of the husbands with HR-HPV positivity. These findings may guide policymakers to initiate HR-HPV DNA-based screening and reconsider vaccination strategies in the hill areas, including the introduction of gender-neutral vaccination.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.